CRM Q & A Archive

Q: Why is it so difficult to sell CRM to management?

A: In a nutshell, the problem is that CRM is all about change - change in the way businesses relate to their customers, or in some cases - change as to who has control over the interactions with the customers. And like any entity, organizations tend to be scared by change. Therefore, a tendency exists to continue to do things the way they've always been done, so many CRM initiatives run into roadblocks because of the changes they will bring to the organization.

Q: What are dangers of not overcoming this fear?

A: The problem is that CRM is not simply an initiative that was invented by some staff members within an organization - the initiatives are derived from customers and their needs. CRM, at its core, is a business strategy built around the concept of the customer. Moreover, if enterprises aren't able to adapt and meet the demands of its customers - whether the environment is business-to-business, business-to-consumer or business-to-intermediary reseller - the enterprise will be at risk. The reason for that risk is that customers will find other enterprises that do a better job of meeting their needs and fulfilling what they're looking for from a customer-relationship perspective.

Q: Do you have any suggestions on how to sell CRM inside the organization?

A: Yes, but they're really more than suggestions. They are closer to be being business rules.
Rule One: There is no silver bullet.
Rule Two: Look for friends in odd places. CRM is a business strategy that often has multiple parts of the organization touching it. Consequently, all those parts must pull together to maximize the effectiveness of the CRM initiatives.
Rule Three: Build CRM justification to management brick by brick.
Rule Four: Look for the major "pain points." Most enterprises already know the weak points of their CRM efforts. Selling the plan will be easier if the sales efforts are concentrated on the pain points.
Rule Five: Have management become a customer.
Rule Six: Think strategically, but invest tactically. Don't try to accomplish all of CRM in one initiative, but you must know where you're headed. That way you can invest for specific, near-term results and still work effectively toward the long-run strategy.
Rule Seven: Find an enemy. Enterprises always work better if they can band together around a common enemy. So look at what the competition is doing in the CRM arena and use that as justification for many of these initiatives.
Rule Eight: Involve your customers every step of the way.

Q: You've outlined some of the things that can be done to sell CRM more successfully to management. What should be avoided? Where are the minefields?

A: Three things are very important. First, some businesses will require more time to discover and value CRM. Therefore, just because the organization is not ready for CRM at the moment, or is resistant to the idea, that doesn't mean that in six months the situation will be the same. Many company executives become more receptive to CRM proposals as they read more and watch the competition.

Second, companies have to realize that CRM, by its very nature, is iterative - meaning that no company gets it right the first time through. One company, for example, considers itself in the seventh iteration of CRM. Company management always tells Gartner the same thing, "Each time we go through another iteration, we learn how really stupid we are as an organization." In other words, the enterprise discovers more and more about what its customers are looking for with each iteration. Therefore, don't get too tied up in the idea that everything must be done initially. You're going to learn, and so your company will get better and better at CRM. Eventually the company will emerge as a strong player in the CRM arena.

The third and last minefield that CRM proponents may encounter is management that totally resists all CRM initiatives. It's quite likely that this will eventually result in the end of their business as an entity. CRM advocates who cannot seem to gain any support in their organizations really need to do an evaluation - that is, what that means long term for their company and re-evaluate their role. In some cases, they may need to find other companies that are more receptive to their ideas.

(Scott Nelson, VP and Research Director)


Beth Eisenfeld

Q: What are the four major tools used to develop CRM economic justifications?

A: The major tools used by clients to support their CRM economics are TCO, benefit calculations, the project work plan and ROI (including break-even analyses).

TCO Model: The TCO model views costs over time for a CRM project holistically across the enterprise. It includes people, process and technology costs and is a fundamental decision support system tool.

Benefit Calculations: Many project managers are unclear about calculating benefits. To calculate CRM benefits, begin with pertinent data (i.e., turnover rates, head count, training costs, operating revenue and contribution) from sales, operations, human resources, training, public relations, finance, marketing and customer service and support. Some enterprises have used Activity-based management (ABM) frameworks to assign fully loaded costs to activities performed within sales, marketing and CSS. When determining the costs and benefits for each of these items, it is crucial to achieve consensus from each functional and departmental champion, as well as the CFO.

Project Work Plan: The application domains of CRM (including TES, TEM and CSS) require unique, individual work plans with specific phases, activities and tasks. Work plans must be broken down into manageable components (e.g., project management, business process design, application design, information management, infrastructure and change management). Each domain plan must be aligned with the overall CRM vision, business process and infrastructure plan, which details execution of the strategies, tactics, process, skills and technology. Each project work plan must also be tied to the costs and benefits.

ROI: ROI (including break-even analyses) is a financial analysis of how a project affects an enterprise's financial statement. To fully appreciate the ROI expected as a result of CRM, a full business-case analysis must be completed prior to undertaking any initiative. The focus should be on understanding the total costs, as well as benefits, of undertaking a CRM initiative and the factors that may affect the achievement of the expected return.

Bottom Line: Successful enterprises need to develop a measurement system that captures the information necessary for calculating costs and benefits prior to CRM investments. These measurement systems will be used to recalculate costs and benefits during pilots, rollouts and throughout ongoing life cycle support for CRM implementation.

(Beth Eisenfeld, Gartner Analyst)