ARCHIVE
ID Number: G00158082



This research is provided for historical perspective;
portions of this document may not reflect current conditions.






HP-EDS Deal Seeks to Close Gap in Outsourcing Dominance
14 May 2008
 
Lorrie Scardino   Dane S. Anderson   Martin Reynolds   David W. Cearley  

HP would jump to No. 2 in worldwide outsourcing services with the acquisition of EDS. But HP will have to manage a complex integration and take a fresh approach to the consulting and integration business to reap rewards.









Browse Topics


Other Options







Contact Gartner






Download Document:

PDF

hpeds_deal_seek...pdf (114.7KB)

Help with Downloads




News Analysis




Event

On 13 May 2008, HP announced it would buy EDS for $13.9 billion. HP would merge its outsourcing operations into EDS, keep EDS's Texas headquarters and name the new entity EDS, an HP company. Closing is scheduled for 2H08.




Analysis

This is a good financial deal for both companies, but this combination alone does not ensure HP and EDS can catch their closest competitors, IBM and Accenture.

This deal gives HP:

  • Double total services revenue, to $38 billion
  • A strong client base across a variety of industries, including new services clients in the public sector
  • A modernized network data center infrastructure
  • Means to fill some capability gaps, especially in application outsourcing
  • 43,000 additional resources in low-cost labor locations

Consulting and system integration (C&SI) becomes a strategic growth opportunity for HP. But HP will have to fight stronger competitors, including Accenture, IBM and many niche and vertical providers that combine front-end C&SI services across a range of solutions, such as CRM and ERP. HP needs to aggressively set up a new C&SI business unit to maximize this opportunity, integrate consulting with solutions, and use HP's technology assets to their full services advantage. If this unit resides in an existing organization, it will struggle as it currently does in both organizations.

HP said there is little client overlap in services, and most of the deal's synergies will come from reducing costs. HP has many opportunities to cut costs, such as using its hardware maintenance organization to support third-party hardware, which EDS contracts out. Gartner also expects job cuts; cutting 10,000 to 15,000 jobs will boost EDS's gross margin and may take it to about 15%, up from 9.7% today.

This large integration will require careful stewardship, and the cultures of the two companies are quite different. The keys to success will be moderate revenue growth, aggressive cost cuts, and using the C&SI business to accelerate HP's growth and profitability.






Recommendations



HP and EDS clients:

  • Determine where you are in the order of importance to each provider and understand their plan for you.
  • Understand the timeline to transition and how the integration will affect your contract and service delivery operations.
  • Examine your contracts for change of ownership clauses. If you are dissatisfied with current operations, this may be a way to get out of the deal or negotiate a better one.
  • Understand how HP intends to leverage EDS’s heritage and best practices for IT and application outsourcing methods, practices and procedures.
  • If your EDS deal is producing subpar financials for either provider, be prepared to address these issues either during the transition or soon thereafter.





Recommended Reading



  • "Vendor Rating: EDS" — EDS continued its momentum in 2007, transitioning to a focus on growth. By Dane Anderson and others
  • "Vendor Rating: HP" — HP is strongly focused on growth to complement profitability and consistent execution. By Carl Claunch and others

(You may need to sign in or be a Gartner client to access the documents referenced in this First Take.)









Browse Topics:
 





© 2008 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction and distribution of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Although Gartner's research may discuss legal issues related to the information technology business, Gartner does not provide legal advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as such. Gartner shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.




Resource Id: 670210