On 2 October 2008, the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Security Standards Council (SSC) introduced the first update to the PCI Data Security Standard (DSS) since September 2006. Detailed information on the update, which is effective immediately, is available at www.pcisecuritystandards.org/security_standards/pci_dss.shtml
.

The updated PCI DSS makes some marginal improvements, bringing clarity to some sections of the standard. However, the update does not address the most fundamental issues facing retailers and other merchants and card-accepting enterprises that are trying to determine and demonstrate PCI compliance and in some areas, broadened requirements will make it even more difficult for them to so. For example, the updated PCI DSS fails to:
Recognize the huge differences between different types of merchants. The PCI DSS still places the same compliance requirements on small e-commerce operations as on large retail chains with hundreds of physical stores, even through their data processing environments are entirely different.
Acknowledge the substantial investments in chip and personal identification number (PIN) card technology made in many parts of the world, including most European countries. These investments should limit the scope of compliance efforts, but the updated standard does not even acknowledge these compensating controls and implementations.
Take into account the steps card-accepting enterprise can take that go beyond current PCI DSS requirements of the standard, notably end-to-end encryption of card data inside enterprise networks and the use of identity-aware networks to limit access to card data. Several large retailers are experimenting with these technologies, which should reduce the scope of compliance efforts.
The PCI enforcement process which is beyond the scope of this update also continues to be troubled by serious issues. The most important of these issues is inconsistency in the quality of assessments by qualified assessors, and even within the same assessment firms. Assessors also continue to sell remediation and managed security services, which cast doubts on the integrity of the assessment process itself.

|