|
Figure 1. |
Classification of Software Environment |
|
|
|
Figure 2. |
Mission-Critical Versus Non-Mission-Critical Environments by the End of 2009 |
|
|
|
Figure 3. |
Utilization of OSS as Building Blocks, Alternatives or Replacements |
|
|
|
Figure 4. |
Use of OSS in Application Software Market |
|
|
|
Figure 5. |
Use of OSS in Infrastructure Software Market |
|
|
|
Figure 6. |
Rate of Deployment for Open-Source Initiatives |
|
|
|
Figure 7. |
Organization Contracts With ESPs for Linux and/or OSS |
|
|
|
Figure 8. |
Source of External Services for OSS in the Next Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
Figure 9. |
Performance Ratings for Linux Service Providers |
|
|
|
Figure 10. |
Performance Ratings of Service Providers Across All OSS |
|
|
|
Figure 11. |
Percentage of Total ESP Budget Used for OSS Services |
|
|
|
Figure 12. |
Percentage of Spending on OSS Services, Current Budget Year and Next Budget Year |
|
|
|
Figure 13. |
Mean Rating Receptive to Using ESPs in the Next 18 Months |
|
|
|
Figure 14. |
Primary Resources in Next Budget Year by Software |
|
|
|
Figure 15. |
Mean Rating of Importance of Services for OSS Compared With Traditional Software |
|
|
|
Figure 16. |
Respondent Organizations by Size |
|
|