ARCHIVE
ID Number: FT-14-8978



This research is provided for historical perspective;
portions of this document may not reflect current conditions.






Lifting U.S. Spectrum Cap Heralds Livelier Wireless Market
12 November 2001
 
Phillip Redman  

By removing limits on how much frequency a carrier can own, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will bolster consolidation of the wireless market and decrease competition.









Browse Topics


Other Options







Contact Gartner






Download Document:

PDF

102320.pdf (35KB)

Help with Downloads



Lifting U.S. Spectrum Cap Heralds Livelier Wireless Market

By removing limits on how much frequency a carrier can own, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will bolster consolidation of the wireless market and decrease competition.


Event

On 8 November 2001, the FCC announced new rules governing the ownership of wireless spectrum:

  • The cap on how much spectrum a carrier can own in any particular city will immediately rise from 45 MHz to 55 MHz.
  • The cap will disappear altogether on 1 January 2003.
  • Limits on carriers owning stakes in other carriers in the same market will disappear in urban areas but will remain in rural areas.

First Take

The FCC raised the cap to 55 MHz to ease the near-term spectrum capacity constraints in the most constrained urban areas but also gave time to establish faster procedures for analyzing transfers of wireless licenses when the cap disappears entirely in January 2003. These moves will please some wireless operators, which face numerous FCC mandates (e.g., enhanced 911 and wireless number portability). These new rules will have little immediate impact on enterprises, but through 2002 some radical changes will likely occur:

  • Consolidation among operators will increase as local and regional players jockey for survival and larger players view competitors more as partners.
  • More spectrum-efficient CDMA operators (e.g., Sprint PCS and Verizon Wireless) had an advantage under capacity constraints, but by 2003 GSM and TDMA players can acquire as much spectrum as they'd like.
  • With more spectrum available, Cingular or VoiceStream could more efficiently run W-CDMA third-generation technologies.
  • A spectrum glut will arise — today, a total of 170 MHz (cellular and PCS only) is available for voice and data services with more spectrum potentially available elsewhere — so the value of spectrum will decrease, heavy investments in this market will decrease, and the market valuation of operators will likely decrease, too.
  • The U.S. wireless market will gain a competitive advantage compared to countries that continue to limit spectrum because the dropping of the spectrum caps will give U.S. operators much more room to offer expanded voice and data services. As capacity grows, the cost per added user and point of presence will decrease while service offerings will increase.
  • Regulators in Canada, Europe and Asia will reassess their own markets and will likely follow the U.S. lead by reducing or eliminating spectrum caps.

Market consolidation that goes too far will reduce competition, decrease the quality of customer service and increase service costs. However, Gartner believes that mergers will link small and large networks together to provide broader and deeper geographic coverage for mobile wireless services.

Analytical Source: Phillip Redman, Enterprise Network Strategies

Need to Know: Reference Material and Recommended Reading

  • “Enterprises: Develop Wireless Policies Now or Pay Later” (TG-14-2856) Gartner strongly advises that enterprises continue to push for centrally purchased wireless services. By Phillip Redman
  • “U.S. Wireless Service Provider Magic Quadrant” (M-13-5974) With the bulk consolidation of wireless carriers concluded in the United States, enterprises are left with a few, much-bigger wireless carriers that provide a more competitive atmosphere for national service. By Phillip Redman and Robert Egan

(You may need to sign in or be a Gartner client to access all of this content.)





Browse Topics:
 





© 2001 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction and distribution of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The conclusions, projections and recommendations represent Gartner's initial analysis. As a result, our positions are subject to refinements or major changes as Gartner analysts gather more information and perform further analysis. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Although Gartner's research may discuss legal issues related to the information technology business, Gartner does not provide legal advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as such. Gartner shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.




Resource Id: 348711