ARCHIVE
ID Number: R-13-8504



This research is provided for historical perspective;
portions of this document may not reflect current conditions.






Enterprise Guide to Gartner's High-Availability System Model for SAP
20 December 2001
 
Derek Prior   Alan Mac Neela   Donna Scott   Josh Krischer   Ian Brown   Jonathan Green-Armytage  

Management Summary Enterprises face many challenges in identifying and understanding all the components of hardware, software and services that are required in a large, mission-critical SAP application. All the components need to be integrated and this leads to a complex infrastructure, even for a small project. Gartner has assembled the required elements into a model that covers, in detail, the technology and services that such an application needs -- server and storage hardware, system software, and consulting and support. Enterprises can use the model to evaluate vendor offerings for SAP projects where high availability is a priority. As an example, Gartner specified a mission-critical high-availability system and invited Hewlett-Packard (HP), IBM and Sun Microsystems to submit proposals for a suitable system. We then scored their proposals and responses to evaluate them against the criteria in the model. Gartner conducted this exercise at the end of 2000. The scores would have been different a few months later. By late 2001, all three vendors had introduced new high-end servers. And Sun had changed to Hitachi as its supplier for storage, which would have changed our ratings of its storage capabilities. But the methodology is more important than the result. And the dynamics of the industry mean that leading vendors will frequently change their relative positions in any ranking or selection process. In this instance, we started by grading the vendors' responses with up to 10 points for each of 32 criteria. The methodology is designed to allow enterprises to weight the scores according to their own requirements so that, for instance, they could give more weight to proactive support services than to operating-system partitioning. Applying representative weightings for the relative importance of the criteria, the maximum possible score was 670, and we scored the vendors as follows: HP 409, IBM 355 and Sun 283. Scoring performance against detailed...







Price: US$1,295.00

Pages: 46








Browse Topics


Other Options







Contact Gartner





Purchasing this document is fast, easy and secure, but you must be registered with gartner.com so we can track your order. Please select your status from these three choices:
Registration is required to purchase this document.
Or, you can register for gartner.com only.
You or your organization may already own this document. Register now to find out. Your Gartner Membership Administrator can supply the needed License Key(s).
You will not lose your document during registration.

Sign in here:
Username:

Password:
Forgot your username
or password?







For more information about purchasing this or other documents, contact Gartner at one of the telephone numbers below:
North America:    +1 203-316-3010 7:30 am - 8:00 pm Stamford, CT
Europe:    +44 1784 267770 9:00 am - 5:00 pm London
Asia/Pacific:    +65 6879 2785 9:00 am - 6:00 pm Singapore
Japan:    +81 3 3481 3552 9:00 am - 5:30 pm Tokyo




Table of Contents



    
Analysis

1.0
    
Introduction

1.1
    
The General Unix Marketplace
2.0
    
Causes of Application Downtime
3.0
    
Survey Process

3.1
    
Specification Presented
3.2
    
Submission Required
3.3
    
Evaluation Criteria and Review Process
4.0
    
Gartner’s SAP HAS Model

4.1
    
Criteria for Evaluating an SAP HAS

4.1.1
    
Technology: Database Server Availability
4.1.2
    
Technology: Application Server Availability
4.1.3
    
Technology: Disk Storage Subsystem
4.1.4
    
Technology: System Manageability
4.1.5
    
Services: System Support
4.1.6
    
Consulting: Design and Build
4.1.7
    
Business Practices
4.2
    
How We Rated the Vendors
5.0
    
The Ratings in Detail

5.1
    
Hewlett-Packard

5.1.1
    
HP’s Technology: Database Server Availability
5.1.2
    
HP’s Technology: Application Server Availability
5.1.3
    
HP’s Technology: Disk Storage Subsystem
5.1.4
    
HP’s Technology: System Manageability
5.1.5
    
HP’s Services: System Support
5.1.6
    
HP’s Services: Consulting Services
5.1.7
    
HP’s Business Practices
5.2
    
IBM

5.2.1
    
IBM’s Technology: Database Server Availability
5.2.2
    
IBM’s Technology: Application Server Availability
5.2.3
    
IBM’s Technology: Disk Storage Subsystem
5.2.4
    
IBM’s Technology: System Manageability
5.2.5
    
IBM’s Services: System Support
5.2.6
    
IBM’s Services: Consulting Services
5.2.7
    
IBM’s Business Practices
5.3
    
Sun Microsystems

5.3.1
    
Sun’s Technology: Database Server Availability
5.3.2
    
Sun’s Technology: Application Server Availability
5.3.3
    
Sun’s Technology: Disk Storage Subsystem
5.3.4
    
Sun’s Technology: System Manageability
5.3.5
    
Sun’s Services: System Support
5.3.6
    
Sun’s Services: Consulting Services
5.3.7
    
Sun’s Business Practices
6.0
    
Conclusions
7.0
    
Recommendations

7.1
    
Addressing Business and Process Issues
7.2
    
Asking the Right Questions

7.2.1
    
Technology Questions
7.2.2
    
Consulting Services Questions
7.2.3
    
Support Services Questions
7.2.4
    
General Questions
7.3
    
Identifying Everything That a Complete System Requires
Appendix A.
    
Related Research
Appendix B.
    
Survey Updates
Appendix C.
    
Acronym Key


List of Figures



Figure 1. 
Concentration in the European Unix Market
 

Figure 2. 
Causes of Application Downtime and Appropriate Responses
 

Figure 3. 
General SAP Configuration
 

Figure 4. 
Gartner’s SAP HAS Model
 

Figure 5. 
Summary of Weighted Scores
 

Figure 6. 
Basic Scores on Technology
 

Figure 7. 
Basic Scores on Services
 

Figure 8. 
Weighted Scores on Technology
 

Figure 9. 
Weighted Scores on Services
 

Figure 10. 
HP’s Configuration
 

Figure 11. 
IBM’s Configuration
 

Figure 12. 
Sun’s Configuration
 



Browse Topics:
 





© 2001 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction and distribution of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Although Gartner's research may discuss legal issues related to the information technology business, Gartner does not provide legal advice or services and its research should not be construed or used as such. Gartner shall have no liability for errors, omissions or inadequacies in the information contained herein or for interpretations thereof. The opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice.




Resource Id: 351008