Gartner Research

Comparing Methodologies for IT Risk Assessment and Analysis

Published: 30 January 2014

ID: G00256964

Analyst(s): Anne Elizabeth Robins, Ben Tomhave, Erik Heidt

Summary

Technical professionals are often asked to research, recommend, implement and execute IT risk assessment and analysis processes. Here we compare and contrast common methodologies, highlighting attributes that readily integrate with risk management programs, as well as scale and evolve over time.

Table Of Contents

Summary of Findings

Comparison

  • "Q" Type, Ramp-Up Time and Cycle Time
  • Cultural Fit: The True Differentiator

Analysis

  • Overall IT Risk Management Process Context
    • Process Presence and Alignment Are Critical
    • Risk Assessment vs. Risk Analysis
    • Meaningful Output Is Essential to Success
    • Scale and Continuous Improvement
    • Centralized vs. Decentralized Approaches
  • Formal vs. Informal Methods: The Case for Triaging
  • Common Errors and Misconceptions
  • Context and Process Are Essential
  • Start Somewhere, and Then Operationalize It
  • Employ a Two-Tier Approach
  • Find Your Inner Quant
  • Good Tools Enable Good Practices

The Details

  • Noteworthy Excluded Methods
  • In-Scope Methods
    • FAIR
    • ISACA COBIT 5
    • ISF IRAM
    • ISO/IEC 31000:2009 and 27005:2011
    • MAGERIT
    • NIST Special Publication 800-30
    • OCTAVE Allegro
    • RiskSafe

Gartner Recommended Reading

©2020 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. This publication may not be reproduced or distributed in any form without Gartner’s prior written permission. It consists of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization, which should not be construed as statements of fact. While the information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Although Gartner research may address legal and financial issues, Gartner does not provide legal or investment advice and its research should not be construed or used as such. Your access and use of this publication are governed by Gartner’s Usage Policy. Gartner prides itself on its reputation for independence and objectivity. Its research is produced independently by its research organization without input or influence from any third party. For further information, see Guiding Principles on Independence and Objectivity.

Already have a Gartner Account?

Become a client

Learn how to access this content as a Gartner client.