Published: 26 April 2022
Summary
Digitalization and the energy transition are changing utilities’ operating models and requirements, with many consolidating their IT infrastructure. EAM technology and service providers must address these dynamics, and other providers can leverage this research to evaluate potential EAM partners.
Included in Full Research
Overview
Key Findings
Utility organizations, despite their size, have varying asset base complexity, asset management strategy and operational capability maturity. EAM products that can flex their product configuration with optional modules for specific functionality, pricing and licensing options can take advantage of these marketdynamics (such as eMaint, Hitachi Energy and IBM).
Some vendors have functional capability differences between on-premises environments versus cloud/SaaS product versions. These include EAM product capability across deployment architecture (e.g., on-premises, cloud, SaaS) and varied cloud infrastructure options.
EAM products have functional capability that is either suited to several industries (horizontal), including utilities (such as Accruent and IFS) as part
Clients can log in to view the entire
document.
- Product or Portfolio Overview
- How Accruent Competes
- Product or Portfolio Overview
- How CGI Competes
- Product or Portfolio Overview
- How eMaint Competes
- Product or Portfolio Overview
- How Hitachi Energy Competes
- Product or Portfolio Overview
- How IBM Competes
- Product or Portfolio Overview
- How IFS Competes
- Product or Portfolio Overview
- How IPS Competes
- Product or Portfolio Overview
- How Oracle Competes