Is it a better strategy to prioritize attention/resources spent on high performing employees or low performing employees? Why?
High performers41%
Low performers33%
Equal on both27%
Unsure0%
79 PARTICIPANTS
VP of HR in Finance (non-banking), 1,001 - 5,000 employees
We definitely spend more time on the higher performing employees to ensure that we're keeping them engaged, and that they have developmental and growth opportunities. While we do try to address our lower performers, our efforts and time are much more spent on higher performers and making sure that we're developing and growing that population.Content you might like
Autocratic5%
Transformational43%
Servant15%
Laissez-faire6%
Democratic8%
Coaching20%
Others3%
148 PARTICIPANTS
CTO in Software, 201 - 500 employees
Without a doubt - Technical Debt! It's a ball and chain that creates an ever increasing drag on any organization, stifles innovation, and prevents transformation.Community User in Software, 11 - 50 employees
organized a virtual escape room via https://www.puzzlebreak.us/ - even though his team lost it was a fun subtitue for just a "virtual happy hour"
Company leadership0%
HR0%
Direct managers0%
Third-party0%
Other (fill in)0%