We have a standard process called an "AoA" (Analysis of Alternatives) that takes the capability requirements and evaluates the candidate offerings against those requirements. Those requirements are typically split between "fit for use" and "fit for purpose" and are prioritized and weighted. Once the suppliers are scored, then the top 1-2 are typically brought into our lab to be tested and validated against the "paper study" that was done as part of the AoA. Those testing results are then compared to the AoA and a decision is made.
What are some best practices to follow when your organization is preparing to end a vendor relationship? What can you do to minimize the operational disruption that would result?
Do you think that "process debt" (workflow inefficiency) is more potentially harmful than technical debt when implementing AI? How do you identify and quantify process debt in your organization, and how do you begin to address it?
What sets us apart?
No selling.
No recruiting.
No self promotion.
Read Our GuidelinesTrusted peer advice and insights for technology professionals.
We have a standard process called an "AoA" (Analysis of Alternatives) that takes the capability requirements and evaluates the candidate offerings against those requirements. Those requirements are typically split between "fit for use" and "fit for purpose" and are prioritized and weighted. Once the suppliers are scored, then the top 1-2 are typically brought into our lab to be tested and validated against the "paper study" that was done as part of the AoA. Those testing results are then compared to the AoA and a decision is made.