What are some effective strategies when it comes to readying your board for security? What gets the biggest response?
When asked for a board presentation in the past, I’ve purposely sent senior leadership the real hot mess that shows we have 250 endpoints that are gaping holes, for example. I always try to have that reality check and then message up: this is why we have these 250 endpoint issues here, this is why we need to upgrade them, or this is why we need to add these layers. That communication is vital to being human in discussion—not hyperbole, and not summarized to the nth degree.
Cyber security's basically a human problem that just goes faster because of technology.
Being able to be the business translator is important. In your head, you think everybody's going to know what MFA is.
Content you might like
crowd strike38%
sentinel one56%
carbon black5%
cynet0%
Yes - Maine did the right thing. There are too many security risks with free versions of these tools. Not enough copyright or privacy protections of data.30%
No, but.... - You must have good security and privacy policies in place for ChatGPT (and other GenAI apps). My organization has policies and meaningful ways to enforce those policies and procedures for staff.53%
No - Bans simply don't work. Even without policies, this action hurts innovation and sends the wrong message to staff and the world about our organization.12%
I'm not sure. This action by Maine makes me think. Let me get back to you in a few weeks (or months).3%