More Detail
The accelerating adoption of GenAI is poised to disrupt traditional commerce models, prompting organizations to reevaluate their engagement strategies for both human and nonhuman customers. Digital commerce is experiencing a significant shift with the rapid expansion of GenAI platforms. This evolving phenomenon will lead to agentic commerce, whereby consumers:
Use GenAI platforms for product discovery
Make purchases either using GenAI platforms’ native check-out capabilities or by using AI agents that can independently search for, evaluate, and purchase products and services
Are served by seller-provided AI agents (seller agents) that assist with the buying journey
Agentic commerce refers to an approach to building commerce solutions based on the use of one or multiple software entities that are classified, completely or at least partially, as AI agents that can discover products, negotiate, decide and transact.
At present, some consumers use AI while shopping during the exploration and research phases of the shopper journey, but these applications are yet to be broadly adopted. As of March 2025, only 11% of consumers reported having recently used a GenAI app or tool while shopping.1 However, broad adoption of GenAI platforms has accelerated drastically in 2025, and digital commerce leaders must gauge future receptivity and adoption among their target audiences to properly prepare for new processes and technology investments related to agentic commerce.
Gartner surveyed U.S. consumers on their openness to the concept of using AI to assist with shopping-related activities. The 2025 Gartner Consumer Omnibus survey assessed agreement with the following statement: “I’d be willing to let AI apps/tools handle or assist me in some of my shopping tasks (researching, narrowing down products/brands, reordering items, etc.).”1
Overall, 44% of U.S. consumers expressed willingness to let AI tools assist with these types of shopping tasks.1 However, this average masks significant variation across demographic groups. The following sections explore how readiness differs by generation, household income and community type.
Generational Differences
Generational attitudes concerning agentic commerce demonstrate notable variation. Data indicates that millennials are the most receptive, with 56% expressing willingness to allow artificial intelligence (AI) to handle or assist with shopping tasks. Following this segment, Gen Z exhibits 48% receptivity, closely matched by Gen X at 47%. In contrast, baby boomers display significantly lower openness, with only 25% overall agreement.1 These findings confirm the expected outcome that there is a greater inclination among younger consumer demographics to adopt AI in their digital commerce buying journeys.
The lifestage or household dynamics typical of these generations also demonstrate a similar pattern. For example, parents with children in the household — a demographic composed largely of millennials and some older Gen Zers — report higher openness to agentic commerce (64%) than empty nesters (29%), a household lifestage represented primarily by baby boomers and Gen Xers. These differences align with expected digital fluency and emerging technology adoption patterns, but also parallel younger consumers’ growing desire to maximize shopping decisions. Since 2021, the proportion of Gen Zers, millennials and Gen Xers who say they exhaustively look for and research as many options as possible to find the best fit while shopping has increased by more than 10 percentage points (13, 15 and 10 points, respectively), while baby boomers have slightly decreased in this behavior (a decrease of 3 percentage points).1,2
If your target customer is a millennial or Gen Z (more receptivity):
If you deploy conversational interfaces or chatbots in native channels such as mobile apps, you should create agents that can interact with messaging platforms and social media, where younger consumers already engage.1,3 Positioning these tools as smarter shopping assistants that support customers’ research, make the process less labor- or time-intensive, and elicit confidence in purchasing decisions may help with adoption. Additionally, you should ensure your brand is discoverable by GenAI platforms and AI agents used by consumers.4
If your target customer is a baby boomer (less receptivity):
Avoid aggressive rollouts of conversational technologies. Instead, offer optional agent support alongside traditional shopping experiences that prioritize simple navigation. Offer chatbots to simplify routine tasks such as reordering or managing subscriptions, and provide clear opt-in controls and the ability to escalate a conversation to a human to maintain trust and comfort.
Figure 1: Consumer Willingness to Let AI Assist or Handle Shopping Tasks by Generation
Gartner 2025

Income-Based Readiness
Consumer receptivity to agentic commerce demonstrates a positive relationship with ascending household income levels. Specifically, 55% of respondents within the high-income and affluent demographics express willingness to adopt AI-assisted shopping. In contrast, 46% of the upper-middle income group agree with the statement. Consumers in the lower-middle income bracket exhibit greater hesitation, with 33% demonstrating overall agreement, while only 25% of low-income respondents articulate openness to such functionalities.1
Greater willingness to embrace agentic commerce among consumers with higher household incomes aligns with their ability to prioritize convenience, premium offerings and time savings over costs. When asked whether they would rather spend money to save time, as opposed to spending time to save money, 39% of higher-income consumers prioritize time over costs, compared with just 22% of lower-middle and low-income consumers.5 Meanwhile, more than a third (37%) of higher-income consumers say they frequently turn to tools and services that save them the mental effort of researching and picking products to buy, compared with just 26% of lower-middle and low-income consumers.1
If your target customer has high or affluent income (more receptivity):
These customers already have higher expectations for convenience-offering experiences while shopping, and may even be willing to pay a premium for AI-embedded services that support this. Invest in AI-based guided selling tools that support complex product discovery, bundling and concierge-style recommendations, especially for more expensive, highly customizable products. These guided selling tools can evolve to become seller agents that interact with customers’ AI agents in the future.6
If your target customer has lower income (less receptivity):
If chatbots are introduced, do so gradually alongside traditional shopping experiences, focusing on assistive features such as guided search or reorder prompts. Embed education into chatbot agent interactions to build trust and familiarity, and prioritize functionality that delivers utility and savings, such as deal alerts and budget-conscious recommendations.
Figure 2: Consumer Willingness to Let AI Handle Shopping Task by Household Income
Gartner 2025

Community Type Influence
Differences in receptivity toward agentic commerce are also apparent across community types. Urban residents demonstrate the highest receptivity, with 54% expressing willingness to adopt AI assistance, followed by suburban dwellers at 42%. Conversely, consumers residing in small towns and villages exhibit 30% overall agreement, while those in rural areas, with 32% overall agreement, display a notably lower inclination to embrace AI-assisted shopping. On average, rural and small-town areas often have lower costs of living and different demographic profiles compared to urban centers, including a higher proportion of older and lower-income residents, as well as varying levels of educational attainment.3 Consumer research on GenAI attitudes has shown that these demographic skews tend to report less enthusiasm toward the technology in general.5,7
If your target customer lives in an urban or suburban area (more receptivity):
If you integrate AI chatbots into omnichannel strategies, ensure they support seamless transitions between digital and physical retail environments, where infrastructure and consumer expectations favor hybrid interactions with brands. For example, urban and suburban consumers are more likely to report having recently used an online store locator (38%), buy online and pick up in store (32%), showroom shop (visiting a physical store to check out a product they intend to buy online: 32%), and use third-party delivery services (28%).3 AI chatbots that are aware of store inventory and can recommend other products or nearby stores could be particularly helpful to urban customers.
If your target customer lives in a rural or small-town area (less receptivity):
Introduce AI chatbots gradually, starting with features that simplify the buying journey without requiring full autonomy. Embed education into chatbot interactions to explain how agents support product discovery and fulfillment, and use agents to bridge access gaps in areas with limited retail options.
Figure 3: Consumer Willingness to Let AI Handle Shopping Task by Community Types
Gartner 2025

Technology Investment
Organizations targeting younger generations, higher-income demographics and urban residents should pursue technology investments and strategy changes to capitalize on the opportunities presented by agentic commerce, such as seller agents, Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, answer-optimized content (AOC) or direct integrations with GenAI platforms. Companies selling products targeting older generations, lower-income demographics, and residents of rural communities should be cautious about overinvesting in applications or strategies that facilitate agentic commerce. Instead, they should closely monitor the adoption of GenAI platforms and the willingness of their target customers not only to use GenAI platforms but also to trust them with tasks in the buying journey.