3.9 out of 5 (7 Ratings)
May 24, 2017
On the bad side: Roadmap (timeline) for release of the additional features would be appreciated. Support for VisualStudio is not at the desired level (there's only preview for VS 2015). Last minute change of the interface that didn't improve usability. No native support for Azure Vault integration (doable through code, not the best solution). On the good side: Great way to solve many corporate needs when it comes to integration, automation, etc. Nice and simple charging plan.
May 23, 2017
Makes certain MVVM stuff is very easy and clean, but when you need to get more interactive with it, you end up having to double code the same thing in JS.
May 18, 2017
Overall, the product delivers what was promised and has done what was needed and expected. It has provded some new difficulties with respect to training and acceptance.
May 15, 2017
Stable and predictable outcome with our software solution implementations. Ability to solve issues without the vendor's involvement.
Apr 30, 2017
Overall, it has been a good experience. Part of it has to deal with how our company implements and customizes software. If we were cookie cutter it would be easy.
Apr 21, 2017
3rd party vendor support is great, ability to know costing up-front is nice
Apr 11, 2017
The framework provides a very effective solution for deploying web applications. It makes the process of development simple and transparent. Codes are easier to be maintained after released to the market. Nevertheless, there are some trade-off in terms of testing. MVC is not optimized for testing - this somehow offset benefits it brings to the development stage.