3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Aug 4, 2016
Product is good at backing up file servers but falters when backing up VMs and flexibility with other storage vendors.
Make sure to analyze the backup speed of VMs and individual file restore speed from within a VM. This is especially true if using Hyper-V
File level backups are very quick after initial seeding (which can also take an incredibly long time).
File backup size limitations and VM level backup and restores. Not being able to manually kick off an individual backup for a server within a policy is also an annoyance.
VM backups, specifically in Hyper-V, do not handle change block tracking well. Backup speeds are not good and doing a file restore from within a large VM level backup is painfully slow.
Have a mixed backup platform of Avamar and Veeam. Provides the ability for great file level backup and great VM level backups.
5 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jul 21, 2016
With all projects there like this one migrating your backup system from one system to another is rather complex. So getting things all setup was very time consuming but now that it’s up and running it runs far smoother than our previous HPE data protector solution.
Make sure to add Data Domain to your implementation!
Speed and the de-duplication reducing overall disk consupmption.
The JAVA GUI interface.
Not written the GUI in Java.But that really is a small annoyance. When you do a Java update sometimes you have to mess with things to get your client working again on your administrator installations
I struggle a bit at first getting from a structured scheduled backup jobs to the more free form nature of Avamar. I would have tried to get myself to stop thinking in those old terms before I got started. It would have smoothed out a few bumps in implementation
There tech support has always been responsive when we've had problems we couldn't sort out ourselves.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jul 14, 2016
overall experience was pretty good with the product.
learn as much from the vendor during implementation as possible.
I would had the vendor hold our hands during implementation so that our team understand the product better.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 13, 2016
Took time to implement.
Pick a great integrator.
Does the job.
Not easy to manage.
Recommend a partner upfront.
More due diligence.
Ok after finding the right integrator.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 2, 2016
Though we have utilized NetWorker for a number of years, it seems that EMC takes too long to get an update to its product line. Plus with finally getting data domain under NetWorker and Avamar this should have been done years ago. Still having issues with OVA product line as it seems we always need to update one piece of the equation before we can get all products to work together.
test test and test. Read the blogs and periodicals don't rely on the sales people or their engineers.
support, time to get the fixes to public, truely putting all their backup products under one group.
help us to understand what we really needed to accomplish the task at hand.
probably more understanding of our virtual infrastructure and the capabilities we need in a product to fulfill our current needs.
5 out of 5.0, Reviewed May 12, 2016
Excellent vendor relationship and knowledgeable support staff.
Research many available types of systems and see what fits best, this was our approach.
Unfriendly interfaces for management.
More around the development, self-installation would be easier, requires a lot of vendor support to maintain.
Very little, worked very well and we have increased ability.
EMCs support is very knowledgeable and detailed.
System could be designed for easier installation by a non-expert
5 out of 5.0, Reviewed May 10, 2016
All of the numbers around compression and deduplication rates held true. We were a bit skeptical about the rates they were suggesting, but they were actually exceeded. We were backing up 12 TB of data with a 6.6 TB node at 33% utilization after 6 months.
The deduplication rates provided during our initial meeting with EMC seemed unattainably high, but they were correct in the end.
Administrative overhead of backups was reduced 90%.
It is an excellent product, but the cost can make it difficult to convince management to move forward.
Better integration with VMWare, which I believe was done in later versions.
Implement Avamar earlier.
Support was always responsive and helpful. Issues were almost always quickly resolved.
The deployment was completed within a day.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Apr 18, 2016
The system has impressive capabilities around backup and deduplication, but comes with a very high price tag.
Be sure to size accordingly. It becomes very costly on the back end to upgrade.
The de-duplication is truly phenomenal. I am seeing almost 10 to 1 on my SAP Oracle DB's.
Pricing and scalability are downfalls to the Avamar.
Better pricing after initial purchase.
We would have approached the sizing exercise differently. Added additional space consideration for growth.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Mar 3, 2016
We had some challenges between Sales and actual deployment that took a bit to get worked out. But the product is great.
If moving from one system to another, pay attention to the compression of the source system as the destination may not be as much so more storage may be needed. Initially everything gets decompressed on move.
The product is rock solid.
Spend a little more time up front (engineering) to ensure they are getting what they really need.
Ensure that we paid close attention to the amount of storage we purchased (without compression).
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Feb 23, 2016
Very reliable product once it is setup.
Watch for hardware bottlenecks, software can handle multiple jobs but hardware is always the bottlneck.
Difficult to setup and troubleshoot if there is an error in setting up a backup.
Would have paid a consultant to get us started and given us best practices in setup.
Not the easiest of setups. Should have gotten assitence in setting up some of the servers to get us started.