Cisco Secure Endpoint vs F--Secure Business Suite

Compare Cisco Secure Endpoint vs F--Secure Business Suite based on verified reviews from real users in the Endpoint Protection Platforms market. Cisco Secure Endpoint has a rating of 4.29 stars with 192 reviews while F--Secure Business Suite has a rating of 0 stars with 0 reviews. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience, pros and cons, and reviewer demographics to find the best fit for your organization.
Overall Peer Rating
4.29
(192 reviews)
0
(0 reviews)
Ratings Distribution
 
 
 
 
 
Willingness to recommend
84% Yes
Would Recommend

Product Capabilities

Overall Capability Score
Overall Capability Score
 
 
 
 
 
4.51
Overall Capability Score
 
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
 
 
 
 
 
4.24
Ease of Use
 
Cloud Management
Cloud Management
 
 
 
 
 
4.39
Cloud Management
 
Prevention
Prevention
 
 
 
 
 
4.33
Prevention
 
EDR Functionality
EDR Functionality
 
 
 
 
 
4.31
EDR Functionality
 
EPP Suite
EPP Suite
 
 
 
 
 
4.31
EPP Suite
 
Managed Services
Managed Services
 
 
 
 
 
4.44
Managed Services
 
Geographic Support
Geographic Support
 
 
 
 
 
4.37
Geographic Support
 
OS Support
OS Support
 
 
 
 
 
4.61
OS Support
 
Malware accuracy and effectiveness
Malware accuracy and effectiveness
 
 
 
 
 
4.65
Malware accuracy and effectiveness
 
Performance impact on endpoint
Performance impact on endpoint
 
 
 
 
 
4.43
Performance impact on endpoint
 
Management interface /ease of use
Management interface /ease of use
 
 
 
 
 
4.57
Management interface /ease of use
 

Customer Experience

Evaluation & Contracting
Evaluation & Contracting
 
 
 
 
 
4.41
Evaluation & Contracting
 
Pricing Flexibility
Pricing Flexibility
 
 
 
 
 
4.24
Pricing Flexibility
 
Ability to Understand Needs
Ability to Understand Needs
 
 
 
 
 
4.48
Ability to Understand Needs
 
Integration & Deployment
Integration & Deployment
 
 
 
 
 
4.46
Integration & Deployment
 
Ease of Deployment
Ease of Deployment
 
 
 
 
 
4.42
Ease of Deployment
 
Quality of End-User Training
Quality of End-User Training
 
 
 
 
 
4.18
Quality of End-User Training
 
Ease of Integration using Standard APIs and Tools
Ease of Integration using Standard APIs and Tools
 
 
 
 
 
4.34
Ease of Integration using Standard APIs and Tools
 
Availability of 3rd-Party Resources
Availability of 3rd-Party Resources
 
 
 
 
 
4.31
Availability of 3rd-Party Resources
 
Service & Support
Service & Support
 
 
 
 
 
4.49
Service & Support
 
Timeliness of Vendor Response
Timeliness of Vendor Response
 
 
 
 
 
4.46
Timeliness of Vendor Response
 
Quality of Technical Support
Quality of Technical Support
 
 
 
 
 
4.5
Quality of Technical Support
 
Quality of Peer User Community
Quality of Peer User Community
 
 
 
 
 
4.2
Quality of Peer User Community
 

Product Review Excerpts

Favorable Review Excerpts
Critical Review Excerpts

Reviewer Demographics

Reviewer Demographics by Company Size
Reviewer Demographics by Industry

Reviewer Considerations

Other Vendors Considered by Reviewers

"Willingness to Recommend" is calculated based on the responses to the question "Would you recommend this product to others?" The options include "yes," "yes, with reservations," "I do not know" and "no." The percentage is calculated as number of "yes" responses divided by total responses for the question.

"Favorable" and "Critical" user reviews are selected using the review helpfulness score. The helpfulness score predicts the relative value a user receives from a given review based on a number of factors. Factors may include the content in the review, feedback provided by other readers, the age of the review, and other factors that indicate review quality. The favorable review displayed is selected from the most helpful 4 or 5 star review. The critical user review displayed is selected from the most helpful 1,2 or 3 star review.