Intel Security (McAfee)

4.1 out of 5 (37 Ratings)

37 Verified Reviews

McAfee, McAfee Endpoint Protection Suite, McAfee Endpoint Protection—Advanced Suite, McAfee ePO, Other...

With small experience, ENS is a great product and very easy to implement

As a government, Mcafee has been selected based on a public market first. but as time passed, i discover a company with many proiducts that are covering almost any security hole in the global architecture. I would like to say that working with Mcafee Products needs perhaps a little bit more engagement than others vendors products but with small experience you can obtain a unified security architecture that is easy to manage. You need some effort on your side but when job is done, everything is fine. ENS is not the easiest security suite to implement or migrate to. especially if linked to ATD or TIE. Lot of choices to do and you need some knowledge but again, when you start to understand what you have in hands, then you discover the power given to you by the product.

McAfee Endpoint Protection Suite, McAfee Endpoint Protection—Advanced Suite, McAfee ePO

McAfee is a leader in threat detection and threat management.

Product Knowledge and availability of SME

McAfee

Reliable company

Experienced in working with larger organisation with complex compliance requirement

McAfee, McAfee Endpoint Protection Suite, McAfee Endpoint Protection—Advanced Suite, McAfee ePO

Very responsive, hard to schedule resources in consecutive weeks. More demand than supply

Very responsive, hard to schedule resources in consecutive weeks. More demand than supply.

McAfee Endpoint Protection Suite

very dissatisfied with detection and support after intel purchased Mcafee

very dissatisfied with detection and support after intel purchased Mcafee

McAfee

partnered with McAfee to ensure the highest standards of data security for my company

Data security is a top initiative for the organisation. The trusted brand gives me the confidence I ensure company data compliance and security. Some of the firewalls prohibit me from accessing other hardware (local printer) and access to web-based email.

McAfee Endpoint Protection Suite

Solution Shifts and Failings Generating Ripple Effects in Vendor Trust

The frustration that products are coming with frequent bug fixes to design flaws that should have been seen in the house before the solution was offered to the market. Often seeing patches re-released, or even pulled entirely. --- Starting to see a theme where support says the products are working to specs., despite not providing the documented performance and or operational expectations. --- Interoperation problems between McAfee's product sets are becoming more prominent, causing us to become solution integrators, and orchestrators, rather than simple consumers. The interoperability concerns are causing increased demands on staff, taking away time from event awareness/management.

McAfee Endpoint Protection Suite

Overall, I would rate my experience with McAfee as very positive.

I am lucky enough to have a great on-site McAfee representative that works in my building, He's not only a great technical support resource, but he's a pleasure to have in the office. This same experience has applied to all interactions I have had with McAfee. There have been some bugs that we run into when we are in a production environment that do not occur in a test environment. However, support has been responsive and helpful, and bugs occur within an acceptable risk margin. Overall, I would rate my experience with McAfee as very positive.

McAfee ePO

Effective, but at times requires to much user interaction, more automation would be nice.

Detection was OnPoint, however, we had limited visibility for detailed information regarding any hits.

McAfee ePO

ePO is a strong tool for managing your endpoints but needs a beefy database server.

EPO has been a responsive and agile solution to managing about 100,000 endpoints and providing important and relevant information and alerting as well as trending and analysis. From broad generalities to very granular information, it's easy and intuitive to be able to tailor your efforts to the goals you've identified. However, the estimates for the database backend are severely underestimated. If deploying or supporting more than a couple of products (especially a super chatty product like Solidcore) their estimations could easily be doubled to truly address the data access and throughput demands.