Loading product reviews...

enterprise-architecture-tools dragon1 All Markets > Enterprise Architecture Tools

Dragon1

4.0 out of 5.0 (2 ratings)

Reviews Distribution

5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
We don't have any qualitative reviews for this vendor yet


View other vendors in this market
We have aggregated ratings data on Dragon1 but all of our reviewers have opted out of sharing their qualitative review feedback. In certain cases we allow reviewers to withhold their qualitative review feedback from public view, in order to protect their confidentiality.
  • 4 out of 5.0, Reviewed

    Product(s): Dragon1

    Dragon1 is the tool that makes very complicated processes, transparent.

    Overall Comment

    Dragon 1 is a great tool.

    What one piece of advice would you give other prospective customers?

    Just try it yourself.


  • 4 out of 5.0, Reviewed

    Product(s): Dragon1

    Dragon1 has a rich functionality, easy to use, and open.

    Overall Comment

    Dragon1 has a rich functionality, easy to use, and open.


Ratings Overview

1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Evaluation & Contracting

Overall rating of product evaluation and contract negotiation

(2)
4.5

Ability to understand your organization's needs

(1)
4.0

Timely and complete response to product questions

(1)
4.0

Pricing and contract flexibility (pricing and terms)

(2)
4.0
1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Integration & Deployment

Overall rating of integration and deployment

(2)
4.0

How long did your deployment take?

0 - 3 months (<3)


Availability of quality 3rd-party resources (integrators, service providers, etc.)

(2)
4.0

Quality and availability of end-user training

(2)
4.0

Ease of deployment

(1)
3.0
1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Service & Support

Overall rating of service and support

(2)
4.5

Did you purchase a support package from vendor?

Yes


Timeliness of vendor's response

(2)
4.5

Quality of technical support

(2)
5.0

Quality of peer user community

(1)
4.0
1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Product Capabilities

Overall rating of product capabilities

(2)
4.5

Repository/Metamodel

(2)
5.0

Modeling

(2)
4.5

Decision Analysis

(2)
4.0

Presentation

(2)
5.0

Administration

(2)
3.5

Configurability

(2)
3.5

Frameworks and Standards

(2)
4.0

Usability

(2)
4.5
1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Additional Context

How many users access the information created by the tool?

Less than 50 users


What was the nature of your involvement?

Development/Integration

Functional Assessment

Maintenance and Support

User Training

Application Lead

Technical Assessment

Vendor Management

Vendor/Product Selection


What other vendors were considered? Multiple responses allowed.

Dragon1

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

SAP


Why did you purchase this product?

Cut costs/improve margins

Improve customer relations/service

Create internal/operational efficiencies

Drive innovation

Drive revenue growth

Improve business process agility

Improve business process outcomes

Improve compliance & risk management


What were the key factors that drove your decision?

Strong customer focus

Strong services expertise

Technological innovation

Architecture scalability

Competitive costs


In which region(s) did your deployment take place? Multiple responses allowed.

APAC

EMEA