Loading product reviews...

integrated-IT-portfolio-analysis-applications hpe All Markets > Integrated IT Portfolio Analysis Applications

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

3.8 out of 5.0 (4 ratings)

Reviews Distribution

5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
We don't have any qualitative reviews for this vendor yet


View other vendors in this market
We have aggregated ratings data on Hewlett Packard Enterprise but all of our reviewers have opted out of sharing their qualitative review feedback. In certain cases we allow reviewers to withhold their qualitative review feedback from public view, in order to protect their confidentiality.
  • 4 out of 5.0, Reviewed

    Product(s): HPE Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)

    Easy Implementation, but needs improvement in usability

    Overall Comment

    Improved user interface, Lots of nice features, but there are defects that make user uncomfortable.

    What one piece of advice would you give other prospective customers?

    Make sure that you have a unified process in your organisation

    What do you like most about the product or service?

    Quick response to the question and willingness to help

    What one thing do you wish the vendor did differently?

    Test well and deliver a defect free product

    If you could start over, what would your organization do differently?

    Test more effectively and work with HPE to fix defects


  • 4 out of 5.0, Reviewed

    Product(s): HPE Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)

    Satisfied with overall functionalities but UI and usability needs a lot of improvement.

    Overall Comment

    Satisfied with overall functionalities but UI and usability needs a lot of improvement.

    What one piece of advice would you give other prospective customers?

    Consider this tool strong in terms of implementing governance framework. However, project execution needs some other tools.

    What do you like most about the product or service?

    The product comes with a lot of good functionalities and flexibility in terms of configurations and customizations. Really a powerful workflow engine that meets all your requirements.

    What do you dislike most about the product?

    UI and performance.

    What one thing do you wish the vendor did differently?

    The resource allocation UI needs a lot of improvements. It should adopt the current industry standards and should give flexibility. Need some more performance tuning tools.

    If you could start over, what would your organization do differently?

    properly assess the requirements in terms of all modules that organization needs and go big bang.

    Product capabilities - overall comment

    Product capabilities are completely built with some limitations but can be ignored

    Integration & Deployment - Overall comment

    Inbound and Outbound integrations and interfaces provided are excellent

    1 of 1 peer(s) found this review helpful.


  • 4 out of 5.0, Reviewed

    Product(s): HPE Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)

    Worked well, but now is out of date.

    Overall Comment

    Vendor support is good, but product is lagging industry requirements. Product is out dated.

    What one piece of advice would you give other prospective customers?

    Review with HP for their future product direction.

    What do you like most about the product or service?

    does PPM basics well.

    What do you dislike most about the product?

    out of date and poor user interface.

    What one thing do you wish the vendor did differently?

    Update the product to effectively compete with the competition.

    If you could start over, what would your organization do differently?

    Nothing, product has become out of date.


  • 3 out of 5.0, Reviewed

    Product(s): HPE Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)

    Evolving with HP PPM

    Overall Comment

    The configuration of HP PPM was done a decade ago and we find it challenging to customize it to adopt newer IT budgeting and Portfolio Management methodologies.

    What one piece of advice would you give other prospective customers?

    Better to look at how much customization would require when compared to out-of-box functionality.

    What do you like most about the product or service?

    Robust architecture. It works for more than 10 years.

    What do you dislike most about the product?

    Usability and staffing-profile concepts.

    What one thing do you wish the vendor did differently?

    More flexible.


Ratings Overview

1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Evaluation & Contracting

Overall rating of product evaluation and contract negotiation

(4)
3.3

Timely and complete response to product questions

(4)
4.0

Pricing and contract flexibility (pricing and terms)

(4)
3.3
1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Integration & Deployment

Overall rating of integration and deployment

(4)
4.0

Ease of integration using standard APIs and tools

(4)
3.5

Quality and availability of end-user training

(4)
3.8

Ease of deployment

(4)
3.8
1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Service & Support

Did you purchase a support package from vendor?

Yes

No


Was the support package worth it?

Yes

No


Timeliness of vendor's response

(4)
3.5

Quality of technical support

(4)
3.3

Quality of peer user community

(4)
3.3
1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Product Capabilities

Overall rating of product capabilities

(4)
3.8

IT portfolio strategy definition

(4)
3.0

IT portfolio creation, management and integration

(3)
2.7

Graphical roadmapping of portfolio elements

(3)
3.0

IT PPM

(3)
5.0

IT Program Management

(3)
4.3

Ability to reference existing EA models from third-party EA repositories, including current and future state, and the variance between them

(2)
2.5

IT-portfolio-level visibility into the interrelationships and impacts shared among the various domains.

(2)
2.5
1 2 3 4 5
Section
1

Additional Context

In which region(s) did your deployment take place? Multiple responses allowed.

North America

Asia/Pacific

Europe, Middle East and Africa