3.6 out of 5 (8 Ratings)
Jan 19, 2017
Good vendor partner
Dec 15, 2016
We were manually doing weekly code releases. Multiple big projects consumed a lot of time and resources. We also wanted to improve security. Initially requirements documentation wasn't completely. After automation of the manual steps be sure to test thoroughly. Due to poor requirement gathering this took longer than expected.
Dec 8, 2016
The process was relatively slow. More help could have been used in change management with business users.
Nov 28, 2016
Aug 22, 2016
Improved user interface, Lots of nice features, but there are defects that make user uncomfortable.
Jul 18, 2016
Satisfied with overall functionalities but UI and usability needs a lot of improvement.
Jun 7, 2016
Vendor support is good, but product is lagging industry requirements. Product is out dated.
Jun 6, 2016
The configuration of HP PPM was done a decade ago and we find it challenging to customize it to adopt newer IT budgeting and Portfolio Management methodologies.