3.6 out of 5 (8 Ratings)
Feb 21, 2017
There are a lot of challenges during the implementation. The tech is great, the idea is awesome, but when it comes to reality, there are a lot of challenges! There was actually a bug in the switch code that was found during the implementation and we had to upgrade the entire infrastructure. Vendor support is decent and willing to work with us.
Jan 24, 2017
Overall with the 3rd party integrator things went well. Took longer than expected to impliment. Cisco support can sometimes be lacking depending on who you are working with.
Oct 18, 2016
The product does the basic request, netwotk access control. But the complication comes in the amount of diverse endpoints, and patch management. We had to upgrade our UCCX environment to support PLUS licensing for profile policy management. We also had to upgrade our AnyConnect version to 4.3, which then required us to upgrade out Cisco ASA firewalls to 9.3.6. The sheer amount of Cisco interconnectivity and dependenices on IOS versions made the configuration and deployment more complicated and lenghty.
Sep 28, 2016
Implementation is still easy on a complex product. It was able to support and integrate with current infrastructure. Ability to provide guest WiFi access to the users and having security controls in place. Cisco support was good.
Aug 15, 2016
For each site, the NAC/ISE report will be used to identify the list of devices listened to but which require remediation - remediation is either a CERT that gets pushed to the device (OR) whitelisting the device if its a headless device.
Aug 3, 2016
Product is not mature for a complex environment.
May 31, 2016
The product worked as expected without any issues. The systems integrated with minimal impact to our users. Cisco Support was superb and always willing to help with any road blocks that were found with the product itself.
Feb 25, 2016
Slow to deliver promised functionality. Requires numerous component upgrades to full integrate and utilize the tools capabilities.