5 out of 5.0, Reviewed Dec 2, 2016
Working on the implementation was great. No issues went unresolved, good response.
Do your homework and prep your environment
5 out of 5.0, Reviewed Nov 29, 2016
When we implemented EOP it lacked standard features available with competing products i.e. Proofpoint and Cisco IronPort. Since then however its caught up with the anti-malware feature sets specifically speaking URL re-writing and sandboxing functionality. We haven't been compromised, so it's been good experience though improved granularity in settings related to anti-spam settings would be great.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Nov 7, 2016
The app is relatively doing what is expected
Going with a cloud provider is a great idea
working great out of the box
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Oct 24, 2016
My only concern is regarding licensing and costs. While they can be clarified with a little work, the pricing seems to fluctuate at times and causes me some concern over the long haul as I could see the fees increasing.
Ensure your organization is ready for this move to the cloud. Ensure you understand the recurring pricing models as much as possible.
Lock in prices and maintain standard offerings. It seems like Microsoft changes their offerings and licensing structures and it creates changes in pricing.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Oct 19, 2016
We have been using Microsoft technologies and we leverage the good academic relationship we have with them. Microsoft has great relations with the academic instituts and maintains it.
take time for planning.
cloud based and under constant updates.
No difference, the solution is the road map we have defined.
well supported product
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Aug 15, 2016
EOP was very simple to implement. We redirected our MX record and reconfigured our SMTP gateway for applications. EOP does not filter as well as our former product, IronPort, but it is simpler to administer and requires less maintenance.
EOP is a simple product to implement and maintain. You need to evaluate that ease vs. your user communities tolerance of spam and knowledge to detect phishing scams.
It's ease of implementation and lack of significant maintenance
It does not catch as much spam, phishing, and virus emails as the leaders in this industry.
It wish the scanner caught more of the phishing and 0-day viruses.
We would probably augment EOP with the IronPort appliance.
It's a good product, it just isn't the best overall email protection service.
We utilize Microsoft Premier Support. they are very prompt and can typically provide a recommendation if we encounter an issue. It usually involves doing something on our end users desktop rather than globally through EOP though.
1 of 1 peer(s) found this review helpful.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Aug 2, 2016
Lots of mail delays and spam issues since the new version has been implemented.
Setup custom rules.
Not very configurable.
More direct response.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jul 6, 2016
Ease of use, friendly UI, could use better migration tools to detect current spam environment and help provide cutover instructions.