Dec 9, 2016
We signed an EA with Microsoft - the more we get into it, the worse it is. Constantly misunderstanding what we are supposed to be getting - Vendor constantly also misunderstanding what we are supposed to be getting. Makes this very frustrating. We are told one thing and then find out something completely different.
Dec 2, 2016
Working on the implementation was great. No issues went unresolved, good response.
Nov 29, 2016
When we implemented EOP it lacked standard features available with competing products i.e. Proofpoint and Cisco IronPort. Since then however its caught up with the anti-malware feature sets specifically speaking URL re-writing and sandboxing functionality. We haven't been compromised, so it's been good experience though improved granularity in settings related to anti-spam settings would be great.
Nov 7, 2016
The app is relatively doing what is expected
Oct 24, 2016
My only concern is regarding licensing and costs. While they can be clarified with a little work, the pricing seems to fluctuate at times and causes me some concern over the long haul as I could see the fees increasing.
Oct 19, 2016
We have been using Microsoft technologies and we leverage the good academic relationship we have with them. Microsoft has great relations with the academic instituts and maintains it.
Aug 15, 2016
EOP was very simple to implement. We redirected our MX record and reconfigured our SMTP gateway for applications. EOP does not filter as well as our former product, IronPort, but it is simpler to administer and requires less maintenance.
Aug 2, 2016
Lots of mail delays and spam issues since the new version has been implemented.
Jul 6, 2016
Ease of use, friendly UI, could use better migration tools to detect current spam environment and help provide cutover instructions.