4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jul 28, 2016
AX is very complex by itself and our implementation complexity was magnified by the fact that we were implementing AX 2012 R3 for 6 different brands (hence 6 different sets of requirements).
Select a strong and experienced implementation partner that has local consultants.
flexibility, breadth of ISV providing bolt-on solutions for AX.
Better and more detailed documentation.
Select a more experienced implementation partner.
5 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 9, 2016
Working with Microsoft to implement the system was simple and quick, most work required was getting business groups to realize that adoption of an external standardized process was more efficient than using their "best practice" process.
Listen to Microsoft, their experience in implementing the system was very helpful to the products success. Optimize processes before implementing them.
Rapid application development, with strong interface connectivity. An ERP that is inexpensive and quick to implement.
Client portion of the application, it significantly increases global deployment effort.
Eliminate the rich client portion of the application. Thin client usage has the most value, as portability of the system is its key to success.
Strictly enforce adherence to standards. Work with users to adopt the out of the box functionality, vs. compromising and change the product.
Able to get Microsoft resources in house and on the problem when faced with issues.
Few issues that were not readily overcome.