3.7 out of 5 (18 Ratings)
Feb 23, 2017
Upgraded/Reimplemented Dynamics AX2012 R3 from an earlier version. We did not use the Microsoft upgrade scripts for code or data, so it was more of a reimplementation than a true upgrade. We tried to go with standard functionanlity as much as possible. Existing customizations were reviewed and re-implmented against AX2012 R3 codebase if deemed necessary. Some integrations were upgradable but others had to be redone.
Feb 21, 2017
The ERP implementation was a greenfield effort so complexity was reduced simply because we were not replacing any significant legacy applications. The primary driver for us was scalability and transaction throughput for our light manufacturing and order operations processes. We completed the implementation in 9 months (ran over by 3 months).
Feb 21, 2017
Pertinent to my role, this software was to assist the financials of the company for all departments - company wide. This software helps compartmentalize numbers that assist in making macro-level decisions (KPIs). Not to mention, the software is highly customizeable and very user-friendly. I cannot speak on behalf of implementation, but from the marketing arena of our business model, NAV is a headquartered solution for the vast majority of our monetary decision-making. In my opinion, this software would ONLY be benificial to small/medium sized business (SMBs).
Feb 21, 2017
GP works well out of the box and provices a service for integration of most transactions. Needed to use a third party tool (SmartConnect) to make the integrations easier to manage.
Feb 17, 2017
It was a very difficult process implementating AX ERP.
Jan 25, 2017
3rd party support was terrible; drove extended implementation and cost.
Jan 19, 2017
The NAV implementation is proving better managed than our cloud based software (Infor SXE) which we are currenty implementing on the other side of our business. Our NAV reseller is knowledgable but not large enough to handle our future needs.
Jan 13, 2017
The experience went well through the guidance of a Microsoft Partner. We established a baseline of success and an acceptable risk factor. We did run into a couple snags while upgrading the back-end SQL database versions. This was done prior to upgrading the application. We did have to rely on backup files to get through this process.
Dec 13, 2016
It was a pain in the a** but we got through it.
Dec 9, 2016
GP is a solid financial ledger, but lacks native functionality for many of our most important business processes. Because of this, we have needed to integrate this system with numerous other tools, which has added a lot of complexity to managing our environment.