4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jul 29, 2016
Effective tool to review all suppliers. Ideal for Supplier evaluation/ overview suppliers. Enables to have a global platform.
5 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 29, 2016
Good support by Pool4Tool. High experience of Project Lead. Very good product portfolio.
Describe in detail your overall requirements.
The strong organization of Pool4Tool.
Describe more detailed the requirements.
5 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 29, 2016
High degree of flexibility towards customer needs in consulting, but especially in the out of the box Customer-Admin-UI.
Focus on the Workflow-Engine. This is the most powerful module of the entire portfolio.
Fast & Flexible towards customer needs.
Change Management across different instances.
Mobility is still an area of improvement.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 17, 2016
Pool4Tool is our most important partner for the purchasing department. 90% of all requests will be taken over P4T.
Start with the easiest modules to implement, and modules with the best ROI.
As a web tool, we don't need any local installation. The system is worldwide 24h available over the internet.
Developing capacities have to increase. Schedule changes needs better communication between vendor and customer.
The increase of the project manager capacity.
Make your processes transparent. Make thoughts about the best practice solutions and your requirements in the Blueprint.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 15, 2016
Quick and fast rollout, flexibility to implement our requirements.
closely follow-up timely realization of actions and to do's.
wide range of the solution.
the last mile (5%) did take too long.
show more best practices instead of special customizations.
provide more comfortable project timeline.
scope of solution.
sometimes disconnect between support and programmer.
SAP integration and connectivity.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 1, 2016
Very good tool for dealing with external partners.
Proper capacity planning. The schedule should not be too tight.
Tight programming capacities.
More project management capacities.
First start the implementation with SRM-module, then with the SCM-module.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed May 6, 2016
Overall product is very powerful and the team sees the value that it provides now and for the future. Internally, launch was a struggle due to a lack of a dedicated project manager, insufficient time spent on process mapping, lack of understanding for system capabilities and unrealistic timing expectations. Externally, challenges included an inexperienced team and inadaquate information sharing.
Identify a dedicated project leader from the user group. Be sure to conduct a reference call/demo with an existing customer.
Powerful - highly configurable which provides flexibility, but can also create customized workflow if an off-the-shelf solution is not readily available. Great product breadth and depth. Overall, this product allows our team become more streamlined and agile with business processes, improved leadership visibility, controls and data management.
Lack of system documentation and reference materials.
The vendor should propose default workflow as a starting point for new customers and then jointly modify throughout the development process. To start with a "blank sheet of paper" approach takes signficantly more time for both parties and exposes the new, unproven workflows to potential problems. Workflow validation needs to be improved. Prefer to start with a best-in-class solution and then adjust.
Our team would have spent considerably more time in the development of workflow process mapping and formalization of these workflow expectations.
Have weekly meetings with launch team to review open issues.
P4T struggled in this area. Do not believe future launches will be as difficult, but improvements with workflow planning and product validation would be expected.