GFI Langaurd vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

Compare GFI Langaurd vs ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus based on verified reviews from real users in the Vulnerability Assessment market. GFI Langaurd has a rating of 4.42 stars with 75 reviews while ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus has a rating of 4 stars with 1 reviews. See side-by-side comparisons of product capabilities, customer experience, pros and cons, and reviewer demographics to find the best fit for your organization.
GFI Langaurd

by Aurea SMB Solutions (GFI Software)

ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus

by ManageEngine

Overall Peer Rating
4.42
(75 reviews)
4
(1 review)
Ratings Distribution
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Willingness to recommend
84% Yes
Would Recommend
100% Yes
Would Recommend

Product Capabilities

Overall Capability Score
Overall Capability Score
 
 
 
 
 
4.46
Overall Capability Score
 
 
 
 
 
4
Vulnerability Signature quality and coverage
Vulnerability Signature quality and coverage
 
 
 
 
 
4.49
Vulnerability Signature quality and coverage
 
Assessment methods
Assessment methods
 
 
 
 
 
4.46
Assessment methods
 
Reporting, Analysis and Metrics
Reporting, Analysis and Metrics
 
 
 
 
 
4.49
Reporting, Analysis and Metrics
 
Cloud and Hypervisor Assessment support
Cloud and Hypervisor Assessment support
 
 
 
 
 
4.32
Cloud and Hypervisor Assessment support
 
Secure Configuration Assessment
Secure Configuration Assessment
 
 
 
 
 
4.46
Secure Configuration Assessment
 

Customer Experience

Evaluation & Contracting
Evaluation & Contracting
 
 
 
 
 
4.56
Evaluation & Contracting
 
 
 
 
 
5
Pricing Flexibility
Pricing Flexibility
 
 
 
 
 
4.42
Pricing Flexibility
 
Ability to Understand Needs
Ability to Understand Needs
 
 
 
 
 
4.55
Ability to Understand Needs
 
Integration & Deployment
Integration & Deployment
 
 
 
 
 
4.4
Integration & Deployment
 
 
 
 
 
5
Ease of Deployment
Ease of Deployment
 
 
 
 
 
4.35
Ease of Deployment
 
Quality of End-User Training
Quality of End-User Training
 
 
 
 
 
4.17
Quality of End-User Training
 
Ease of Integration using Standard APIs and Tools
Ease of Integration using Standard APIs and Tools
 
 
 
 
 
4.4
Ease of Integration using Standard APIs and Tools
 
Availability of 3rd-Party Resources
Availability of 3rd-Party Resources
 
 
 
 
 
4.25
Availability of 3rd-Party Resources
 
Service & Support
Service & Support
 
 
 
 
 
4.3
Service & Support
 
 
 
 
 
5
Timeliness of Vendor Response
Timeliness of Vendor Response
 
 
 
 
 
4.42
Timeliness of Vendor Response
 
Quality of Technical Support
Quality of Technical Support
 
 
 
 
 
4.28
Quality of Technical Support
 
Quality of Peer User Community
Quality of Peer User Community
 
 
 
 
 
4.17
Quality of Peer User Community
 

Product Review Excerpts

Favorable Review Excerpts
Critical Review Excerpts

Reviewer Demographics

Reviewer Demographics by Company Size
Reviewer Demographics by Industry

Reviewer Considerations

Other Vendors Considered by Reviewers

"Willingness to Recommend" is calculated based on the responses to the question "Would you recommend this product to others?" The options include "yes," "yes, with reservations," "I do not know" and "no." The percentage is calculated as number of "yes" responses divided by total responses for the question.

"Favorable" and "Critical" user reviews are selected using the review helpfulness score. The helpfulness score predicts the relative value a user receives from a given review based on a number of factors. Factors may include the content in the review, feedback provided by other readers, the age of the review, and other factors that indicate review quality. The favorable review displayed is selected from the most helpful 4 or 5 star review. The critical user review displayed is selected from the most helpful 1,2 or 3 star review.