5 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 30, 2016
Great product. No match.
Look at Office 365 instead of on-prem if you don't have PHI data.
Integrates well with Windows environment.
Dependency on SQL Server for files.
Blobs in SQL Server.
Minimize the site collections size.
1 of 1 peer(s) found this review helpful.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 15, 2016
Architect it accordingly. Use a load balancer with your web servers.
Having to go out and purchase 3rd party snap-ins/utilities.
Meet the needs for web parts and 3rd party utilities so clients did not have to go out and purchase these 3rd party utilities to meet the needs of its clients for items that aren't available in Sharepoint 2013. Types of things we have had to buy are print capabilities for forms like nintex and a more robust Organizational chart. Security comes to mind on these 3rd party utilities, and we aren't able to effectively vouch for the security and whatnot within them.
Nothing to note.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 14, 2016
Good experience. I was testing the product.
increase your testing group.
it's very broad.
not getting the basics of how SharePoint builds. In order to build it out efficiently and create roles from the beginning.
Some areas were not clear as of how you build out SharePoint.
provide more user testing.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 13, 2016
highly configurable but as a workflow management tool, it had limitations. Also, the implementation took many of the features out as it did not meet business requirements.
consider your use cases broadly between different groups (risk, tech, product, security, etc)
integration with project.
site management is bit cumbersome.
integrates well with MS products but not others.
would consider workflow management as a key requirement rather than document change control and sharing.
not part of the technology deployment team.
Overall implementation was costly. Just wished it can be used more broadly.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 9, 2016
Overall is good.
Well known vendor and lots of community engagement.
Strengthen or improve the Wiki component.
So far it met our requirement needs.
Satisfied with service and support.
Since we already have experience with the previous version, transition to new version was not a big challenge.
2 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 7, 2016
It is only functional as a database tool. It does not adequately function as a PPM or PM Tool.
Do a complete review and don't just buy a name brand.
Sharepoint does more than just database information.
Reevaluate overall end user needs and then decide on software utilization.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 7, 2016
The support was very timely and provide quick response to questions.
Ensure collaborative stakeholders are involved at the beginning. The stakeholder needs are important to ensure that the enterprise needs are recognized.
Usability by staff in a short turnaround time.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Jun 6, 2016
Great for a quick deployment to manage IT projects. Stood up a new process for IT projects and this tool was already familiar to our user community. Allowed for standardization and guidance of project sites so that the new methods/processes were easy to follow.
Pilot, pilot, pilot.
The product was already used within our organization so the learning curve was just around IT project management process deployment.
The inability to search in explorer by tags.
Great for a quick deployment to manage IT projects. Stood up a new process for IT projects and this tool was already familiar to our user community. Allowed for standardization and guidance of project sites so that the new methods/processes were easy to follow. I would likely deploy sub-sites differently than we did in the first round. PMs of larger projects need more flexibility/control of their sites.
4 out of 5.0, Reviewed Mar 16, 2016
evaluate business value.
more high level expertise provided upfront.
works well for our organization
had to overcome several challeges with deployment due to customization.
3 out of 5.0, Reviewed Mar 15, 2016
Good, not great, but need training.
Train, train, train create robust templates for microsites that can be easily adapted.
not simple, you need to be very methodical, use best practices.
More upfront internal advertsing and training.