What is your average false positive rate?

Threat Intelligence & Incident ResponseThreat & Vulnerability Management

20% or less21%

21-30%29%

31-40%20%

41-50%17%

51-60%5%

61-70%1%

71-80%2%

Over 80%1%

Unsure

402 PARTICIPANTS
2.8k viewscircle icon1 Upvote

Content you might like

How are you diversifying threat intelligence sources? Have you been able to reduce reliance on CISA for TI?

Are you concerned that generative AI tools will make it harder to spot phishing attacks?

Extremely concerned: we need a mitigation strategy ASAP!17%

Somewhat concerned72%

Slightly concerned: it’s on my radar but not a key focus10%

Nope! Not at all concerned

View Results

How valuable to reducing change/fail % is it if a sys admin is able to predict the impact of a kernel or glibc change before applying the change to their Linux systems?

Highly valuable30%

Moderately valuable68%

Not valuable at all.1%

View Results

How are companies doing Unified Vulnerability Management? The idea is bringing all inputs (AppSec, DevSecOps, VM scanning, asset discovery etc) into one platform.  Instead of creating a homegrown solution, are there vendors that do this well?

Is red teaming a better way to demonstrate security needs to the board than traditional compliance audits?

Read More Comments
What is your average false positive rate? | Gartner Peer Community