What’s the best place to start when evolving data governance?

The data19%

The people43%

The processes21%

The policies12%

I wish I knew5%

682 PARTICIPANTS
25.5k viewscircle icon8 Upvotescircle icon13 Comments
Sort by:
VP of IT3 months ago

Actually all, but data is the driving factor for anything. All people, processes, policies are going to start with data, otherwise, we will endup saying he says, she says.

VP of Data and Analytics3 months ago

You need to look all , People , process, policies and data.

Sr. Database Administrator in Insurance (except health)4 months ago

Start with the basics—automate your policies right when data is created, not after something goes wrong. Classify data early, keep access consistent across platforms, and build in guardrails that fix themselves. That’s how real, scalable governance begins—not with audits, but with architecture.

Chief, Data Strategy Section in Government6 months ago

My easy-way-out response would be that you do not necessarily need to start with any one of these. You can simultaneously act on some or all of them. Staying within the question though, the most foundational and far-reaching aspect is policies in my view. Data is ever-growing/evolving and reactive, hard to steer things with it. People and processes are also fluid with reactions that depend on the situation. Policies are the most slow-moving, but far-reaching aspect, giving a team time to make informed changes to policies that hopefully fan out to the data, people, and processes. (This is why policies tend to be set from the top down.) Of course, all of these are important and ultimately need to be delt with for effective data governance.

Chief Data Analytics Officer & SVP Digital Technology in Consumer Goods2 years ago

I think this depends on your approach to policies in your organisation.  For ourselves, where we are starting with our policy framework is actually focusing on defining clear strategic principles and ensuring these are aligned and have sponsorship top down.  With this we can use these principles to drive the review of people and process capabilities against these agreed principles.

Lightbulb on2

Content you might like

Strongly agree13%

Agree64%

Neutral18%

Disagree2%

Strongly disagree

View Results

We have great autonomy to take on controlled risks in the innovation process26%

We have an agreement upon flexibilities in the compliance and information security process exclusively for innovation, with lower requirements67%

We follow the same compliance and information security processes required for production solutions31%

Compliance and information security teams work into agile innovation cell, with tight SLA11%

View Results