The developer of WASP malware claims it is undetectable — is that likely true?

Threat Intelligence & Incident Response Threat & Vulnerability Management

Very likely2%

Likely37%

Moderately likely26%

Moderately unlikely15%

Unlikely8%

Very unlikely7%

Unsure2%

161 PARTICIPANTS

1.6k views1 Upvote1 Comment

Sort by:

Strategic Banking IT advisor in Banking3 years ago

I find it hard to believe that nothing could detect it. With advanced AI techniques, I'm sure that 'undetectable' will be less and less possible.

Content you might like

How often do you survey your organization for new, emerging risks? My company currently does quarterly surveys and I am contemplating dropping it down to 2x/year. Appreciate the insights!

Read More Comments

When sourcing new cyber tools, do you conduct a separate evaluation to assess the vendor independently of their product?

Yes 62%

Only in some cases 35%

No3%

View Results

When it comes to the vulnerability management process, where can current AI capabilities provide the most value? Have you had success with using AI-enabled tools specifically for deduplication, false positive reduction, prioritization, etc.?

Read More Comments

For those who test mass notification systems with employees, what has been your typical response rate (e.g., 70%)?

<60% response rate23%

61% - 75% response rate50%

76% - 85% response rate25%

>86% response rate2%

View Results

For European companies with DORA requirements – DORA expects to have in place exit strategies for critical IT providers, and internal IT providers. How are you handling exit strategies for internal IT providers (especially when they're set up as separate legal entities within your group)? More importantly, has anyone actually conducted the required exit strategy tests for internal providers, and if so, how did you approach it?