Which of these Email security, continuity cloud services do you see as most effective? 

CloudSecurity & GRC

Barracuda12%

Mimecast23%

Forcepoint11%

Cisco14%

Spam Titan2%

Sonicwall2%

Sophos4%

Fireeye3%

Microsoft23%

Appriver

McAfee

731 PARTICIPANTS
5.4k viewscircle icon1 Upvotecircle icon6 Comments
Sort by:
Director of IT in Software3 years ago

Abnormal Security

AVP IT, CTO, and Deputy CIO in Education4 years ago

You don’t have Proofpoint on the list.

Lightbulb on2
Associate Vice President, Information Technology & CISO in Education4 years ago

Definitely Proofpoint

COO in Healthcare and Biotech6 years ago

Agree with Proofpoint. Disagree strongly with MSFT being effective. Have had to add security for their O365 suite. Very disappointing, and they know it...

Lightbulb on1
Director Certifications in Education6 years ago

Yes indeed, Proofpoint

Lightbulb on1

Content you might like

What’s your approach to cloud cost management tools? Do you see value in paying for third-party services to monitor cloud spend, or have you found more cost-effective alternatives?

Read More Comments

To what degree do you agree with the following statement: “I am frustrated with my current cloud service provider (CSP) or cloud managed service provider (MSP) and am actively considering switching to another in the next 12 months”

Strongly agree10%

Agree62%

Disagree22%

Strongly Disagree5%

View Results

To simplify your IT, do you expect all the security controls (CASB, ZTNA, SEG and SWG) delivered by the same vendor?

Yes, I am looking at consolidating multiple vendor solutions79%

No, I am fine with managing multiple vendors20%

Has anyone successfully completed a transition from Salesforce CPQ (Steelbrick) to Salesforce Revenue Cloud? We are in a high tech industry domain and happened to customize our Steelbrick CPQ to meet the business needs and now that Steelbrick CPQ is no longer being sold, the innovation is coming to an end. Salesforce hasn't announced a EOL date. Has anyone gone through this transition and what was it like - pain points, best practices, etc?

Our organization is implementing an Internal Developer Platform (IDP) to enable self-service infrastructure provisioning, and we're evaluating Terraform Cloud workspace management strategies.  We're debating between: - VCS-driven approach: Repository-based workspace management with GitOps workflows - API-driven approach: Programmatic workspace creation and management via Terraform Cloud APIs Specific Questions: - Which approach have you found more effective for true self-service at scale? - How do these approaches handle multi-tenancy and isolation requirements? - What integration challenges did you encounter with developer portals/service catalogs? - How did your choice impact developer adoption and platform team operational overhead? Would love to hear about your real-world experiences, particularly around the trade-offs you discovered post-implementation.