Are you following the FTX bankruptcy case?

Regulatory Compliance Governance, Risk & Compliance

Yes, very closely23%

Yes, somewhat closely54%

Yes, casually13%

No9%

134 PARTICIPANTS

1.2k views1 Upvote1 Comment

Sort by:

Director of IT in Software3 years ago

Quick Note LOL

Content you might like

What sorts of challenges have you encountered in adapting your governance framework to address AI adoption across business units, and how are you attempting to resolve these?

Read More Comments

How does your cyber compliance team stay informed about new and changing regulations impacting your organization's compliance? Additionally, how are cyber compliance teams tracking, measuring and reporting on internal compliance?

Read More Comments

Does your org use Protection-level agreements (PLAs) when planning cybersecurity investments?

Yes, always25%

Sometimes49%

No, never17%

Not yet, but we're going to start5%

What's a PLA?2%

View Results

‘AI’ Business Model – With many components flowing into the AI domain (cost, data, E&C, people, value, strategy, duplication of everything, etc.), I’ve started to think about splitting out ‘AI’ from the operating model and putting it into a separate legal entity. This way, I could manage a) risk and compliance, b) cost, c) resource allocation, d) governance, e) IP, f) revenue generation, etc.

Of course, this isn’t new in general, but I’m especially interested in how this approach could help with the ongoing challenge of ensuring compliance with data privacy and regulations related to LLMs and data access/usage over time.

My question: Is anyone else thinking about this, or has anyone already done it? I know there are examples in the literature, but I wanted to float this here for general comments and discussion.

Read More Comments

Should Operational Technology (OT) cybersecurity controls (like NIST) be required by law, or remain as recommendations to businesses?

Control required by law.68%

Business recommendations.31%