Google, Anthropic, Microsoft and Open AI are forming a Frontier Model Forum to promote responsible AI. Do you find it encouraging to see an industry forum on responsible AI?

Machine Learning (ML)Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Yes, it’s great to see industry taking initiative25%

Somewhat, but it is yet to be proven worthwhile58%

No, I think it’s more PR than anything16%

I haven’t got a strong opinion1%

118 PARTICIPANTS

821 views1 Comment

Sort by:

Director of Data2 years ago

It is encouraging development, seven tech titans including Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI have pledged to lead in responsible AI development.

This commitment encompasses:

1️⃣ Bias Protection:
Ensuring AI systems do not discriminate or exhibit bias.

2️⃣ Transparency & Explainability:
Making AI workings clear, understandable, and transparent to users.

3️⃣ Security & Privacy:
Building robust, safe AI systems that respect and protect user privacy.

4️⃣ Accountability:
Owning up to potential AI-related harms.

This initiative signifies a monumental shift towards fair and beneficial AI, highlighting a shared vision for a better technological future.

But, it's important to remember, this is only the beginning.

As an advocate of Responsible AI, I'm inspired by this commitment. Yet, it also highlights the continued effort we need to put in.

Responsible AI is about creating tech that actively promotes fairness, equity, and inclusion.

It's not a cookie-cutter solution; it's a constantly evolving, dynamic process requiring our constant attention and proactive innovation.

Content you might like

Are any of these AI risk management frameworks used by your org?

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI 600-1)27%

EU AI ACT33%

ISO 4200133%

MITRE (Sensible Regulatory Framework for AI Security or ATLAS Matrix)38%

Google's Secure AI Framework (SAIF)13%

IEEE Ethically Aligned Design (EAD)9%

Something else (share in a comment)2%

View Results

Have you deployed AI agents? What’s been an unexpected use case you’ve discovered?

For European companies with DORA requirements – DORA expects to have in place exit strategies for critical IT providers, and internal IT providers. How are you handling exit strategies for internal IT providers (especially when they're set up as separate legal entities within your group)? More importantly, has anyone actually conducted the required exit strategy tests for internal providers, and if so, how did you approach it?

Can you share any effective processes/strategies you’ve used to integrate cyber risk management and enterprise risk management at your org?

What are key ways in which your organization should hire affordable AI and data science talent? Check all that apply.

Recruit talent from diverse or non-traditional backgrounds (e.g. different degrees, institutions, or work experience)34%

Recruit less experienced AI talent with a high aptitude to learn 47%

Communicate the intrinsic benefits of the role (e.g., mission, culture, resources, opportunity for impact) 28%

Build talent pipelines through partnerships with academia and professional societies46%

Hire and upskill internal talent50%

Use specialized AI recruitment agencies11%

Other (please share details in comments)3%