When AI systems like ChatGPT refer to themselves, do you believe they should use "I" or a different term like "it" to eliminate any emotional or intellectual implications that may lead to confusion or deception? Are we getting too comfortable with not distinguishing between text from a person and text from "it"?

2.5k viewscircle icon3 Comments
Sort by:
Global Director of Technology in Real Estate2 years ago

The use of "I" for self reference is appropriate and any other pronoun would create confusion.  When others refer to ChatGPT they appropriately use "it" and that's also clear.   If the AI used its name in all self reference that would be clear but I don't think it adds clarity or value.  

VP of IT in Healthcare and Biotech2 years ago

Semantics about the ChatGPT is evolving into a personal digital assistant. The basis assumption it is a digital twin of the person. In my opinion it is nNothing wrong about addressing it as " I "
 

CTO in Travel and Hospitality2 years ago

Dont think it matter so much

Lightbulb on1

Content you might like

Significantly - GenAI will greatly alter the traditional CIO role19%

Moderately - GenAI will cause some changes, but the role will adapt54%

Slightly - GenAI will have minimal impact20%

Not at all - GenAI will not disrupt the traditional CIO role6%

View Results

Unrealistic60%

Realistic32%

They aren't thinking about it right now8%

View Results