Are you consuming ChatGPT’s API? What are the business cases to do so?

1.4k views11 Comments

CTO in Banking, 51 - 200 employees
A lot of my enterprise clients have already started consuming the API. They're using it to make sense of market information for trading, as well as parsing user generated traffic in order to gauge sentiment. I have been surprised at just how many global organisations have embraced the interface, given the usual reservation for new technology in a highly regulated environment.
Chair and Professor, Startup CTO in Education, 5,001 - 10,000 employees
I wish I could join. But there is a schedule conflict.
Senior Vice President, Engineering in Software, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
We are using it in the pre-production environment of a next-gen product centering around blockchain data. We are using it to create SQLs and python code from natural language prompts. It's a daunting task since most of its models don't support proper training and that means every time we need an output, we need to send tons of metadata to it so that it can use it to create the expected result. Also, the API response time is not up to the mark.
Head IT in Manufacturing, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
Not yet, but the starter use cases are embedding it in Office and use it for live help and cases.
Co-founder & CTO in IT Services, 11 - 50 employees
We plan to use ChatGPT API for chatbots, content and are working on a Q&A application to help our users with human like responses to their teaching related enquiries
Associate Vice President & Head IT in Manufacturing, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
I see a good use case for re-writing our Policies, KRAs and Job Descriptions using ChatGPT APIs. It is effective in Content writing and Social Media Announcements also. I am evaluating Integrating APIs in the coming months.  
VP of IT in Construction, 11 - 50 employees
Not yet! As a business, we are yet to agree on the use of ChatGPT
Vice President, Infrastructure Architect in Finance (non-banking), 1,001 - 5,000 employees
Not yet.  Given the error prone nature of these tools it seems foolish to jump in so quickly, especially in an industry where we are regulated on the advice we give to clients.  The outsourcing of thinking seems to be way too silly a use case.
CTO in Software, 2 - 10 employees
Domain knowledge base
President in Software, 51 - 200 employees
I was able to write a complicated product FAQ in about a quarter of the usual time with a much better result. This worked exceedingly well for questions which were not extremely product-specific. Obviously the more product-centric questions were out of scope but even the generic content it generated could be readily adapted. Better, faster, cheaper, and easier. This is the future.

Content you might like

IPA has significantly improved our operations.7%

IPA has not brought much change to our operations.34%

IPA is very similar to traditional automation in our company.25%

IPA is quite different from traditional automation in our company.10%

Our company had a smooth implementation of IPA.2%

Our company faced some challenges during the implementation of IPA.5%

Our organization has integrated IPA with other technologies such as RPA and BPM.2%

Our organization has not yet integrated IPA with other technologies.8%

We have not yet encountered any significant challenges with IPA.2%

Our organization has automated some processes using IPA.2%


1.6k views1 Upvote1 Comment

CTO in Software, 201 - 500 employees
Without a doubt - Technical Debt! It's a ball and chain that creates an ever increasing drag on any organization, stifles innovation, and prevents transformation.
Read More Comments
46.7k views133 Upvotes324 Comments

Cyber Security38%

Cloud Computing/Cloud Migration44%

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)67%

IoT (Internet of Things)28%

Digital Transformation:34%

WFH/Remote Work16%

Legacy Systems Modernization13%

Data Management11%


2.5k views1 Upvote