Have you ever encountered issues with the built-in automated testing of low-code/no-code tools? How did you solve the problems you ran into?

Quality, Testing and Security Automation

846 views3 Comments

Sort by:

Director of IT in Manufacturing2 years ago

Manual testing still plays a crucial role in ensuring the quality of your low-code/no-code applications, If the built-in testing capabilities of your low-code/no-code platform are limited, consider utilizing external testing tools and frameworks that can integrate with your applications, Look for tools that offer integration options or provide APIs for interacting with your low-code/no-code applications.

CIO in Education2 years ago

We are still in the early adoptive stages of low/no-code tools. So far, we have not run into any issues, maybe because our applications are not very "heavy" on resources.

VP of IT in Finance (non-banking)2 years ago

Yes, multiple times. The ovecame it by using customized templates and API integrations.

Content you might like

What is the most interesting/helpful/unique tool you're using right now that no one is talking about?

How much of a role does QA outsourcing have in your software development process?

100% of software testing/QA is outsourced6%

75% or more is outsourced25%

50% to 74% is outsourced27%

25% to 49% is outsourced12%

less than 25% is outsourced13%

All software testing/QA is done internally12%

N/A: we don't do software testing1%

View Results

When evaluating test automation or application security testing tools, which integrations are important to you? Choose all that apply.

Atlassian Bamboo15%

Atlassian Jira49%

Axosoft OnTime19%

Azure DevOps43%

Bugzilla17%

Circle CI8%

Cucumber Studio5%

Git28%

HP ALM4%

Jenkins23%

Selenium14%

Subversion7%

TeamCity7%

TestRail8%

Travis CI4%

XRay4%

Zephyr3%

Other: tell us in the comments1%