How do you move your AI workloads to the cloud?

2.3k viewscircle icon5 Upvotescircle icon5 Comments
Sort by:
Director of IT in Healthcare and Biotech3 years ago

moving workload to cloud gives you cost efficiency, all the resources required,  newest technologies, and flexibility with business needs. AWS is my preference, while other player also offerf good value for money.

Lightbulb on1
Senior Product Marketer in Software3 years ago

AI workloads can indeed benefit from the cloud's scalability. If you move them to the cloud, you'll probably watch your compute costs skyrocket. This is true whether you choose AWS or Azure, and whether you deploy containers in Kubernetes or good-old VMs. 
So it's crucial to accompany this transformation with a serious cost optimizer that supports stateful workloads. AWS and Azure do have their native tooling for that, but 3rd party solutions usually generate way more savings. Just be sure to carefully inquire how their stateful support is delivered, and whether it satisfies your workloads' needs: Persist data, persist network, both, or something beyond that. Good luck. 

Global Vice President of Sales in Software4 years ago

AWS is the simplest and most cost effective platform - I would encourage you look into that platform.

C-Suite in Energy and Utilities4 years ago

First of all, it needs to be aligned to your cloud strategy, where Cloud native platforms will be critical for your AI workloads.

Lightbulb on2
Chief Information Officer in Finance (non-banking)7 years ago

AI workloads are best suited for cloud and the journey should actually begin from Cloud native platforms like tensorflow, AWS sagemaker, Azure ML etc. These platforms are built to handle massive data workloads and can expedite the training cycles for ML.

Lightbulb on2

Content you might like

Daily10%

Weekly43%

Monthly21%

Every 2-3 months11%

Every 4-6 months8%

Every year or less frequently6%

View Results

Yes, this would alleviate pressure on the team44%

Somewhat, AI agents could play a role but humans need to be involved52%

No, this would be too risky4%

View Results