How are security leaders at manufacturing companies handling the use of ChatGPT and other generative AI tools that have gained tremendous popularity lately while not fully mature? Prohibit?Prohibit with an exception process? Issue strong guidelines on how to use? Something else? 

996 viewscircle icon1 Upvotecircle icon4 Comments
Sort by:
Vice President of Sales in IT Services2 years ago

Issue strong guidelines on how to use.

Lightbulb on1
VP of IT in Manufacturing3 years ago

Strong guidelines on how to use.

Lightbulb on1
CTO for Digital & IT in Healthcare and Biotech3 years ago

So far we have been leaning towards option 3, so as not to stifle innovation while still making sure people are aware of the risks & of their responsibilities. Prohibiting the tools can also quickly devolve into a game of whack-a-mole as new options appear every day. At the same time, we would like to quickly get onboard with corporate-friendly options from our cloud providers, be it collaboration tooling (Google Workspace, Office365) or cloud infra (AWS, GCP, Azure) so that we can continue to build in a safer environment.

Lightbulb on3 circle icon1 Reply
no title3 years ago

Thank you, <mention id="636b1bf44207780001436050" displayname="Jeremy Gibbons"></mention>. Our thoughts exactly. The quicker we provide proper guidance and manage the chaos, the better outcome we will have. It would also address the risk as well.

Content you might like

SaaS discovery solution (like Netskope or Cisco Umbrella) 26%

CASB tool 42%

Packet sniffing (deep packet inspection) tool 16%

EDR tool/platform 37%

Something else (please share in a comment) 16%

N/A — we’re not currently using any tools to track shadow AI11%

View Results

Increase AI spending41%

Keep AI spending the same41%

Decrease AI spending18%

View Results