How does the recent ruling on AI-generated content and copyright affect the way organizations use and distribute content created by AI algorithms?

744 viewscircle icon2 Upvotescircle icon2 Comments
Sort by:
Fellow at CodeX, The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics & Generative AI Editor at law.MIT2 years ago

The recent ruling on AI-generated content and copyright has significant implications for organizations that use and distribute content created by AI algorithms. In light of this ruling, it becomes even more crucial for organizations to carefully negotiate indemnities in their contracts when dealing with AI-generated content. 

Tips for Negotiating Indemnities in AI-Generated Content Contracts:

Define responsibilities clearly. Ensure the contract clearly defines the responsibilities of each party regarding AI-generated content. Specify who is responsible for content creation, distribution, monitoring, and addressing any legal issues that may arise.

Scope of indemnity. Clearly delineate the scope of the indemnity clause. Determine what types of claims or liabilities it covers, such as copyright infringement, and whether it extends to third-party claims.

Financial limits. Consider setting financial limits or thresholds for indemnity obligations. This can help prevent one party from shouldering excessive financial burdens in the event of a legal dispute.

Insurance requirements. Determine whether the contract should require one or both parties to maintain appropriate insurance coverage to cover potential liabilities related to AI-generated content.

Dispute resolution. Establish a process for resolving disputes related to indemnities, such as mediation or arbitration, to avoid costly litigation.

Review legal counsel. Given the complexity of AI-generated content and copyright issues, it's advisable to involve legal counsel experienced in technology and intellectual property law to help negotiate and draft indemnity clauses.

Lightbulb on3 circle icon1 Reply
no title2 years ago

Excellent points here, Olga. 

Lightbulb on2

Content you might like

Yes, this is a good move for both the business and employees to recharge.24%

Yes, but vacation time could have been offered through a less disruptive model.44%

No, we can't afford to lose that many consecutive operating days.25%

Other (please share below)5%

View Results

Yes47%

No22%

Planning to30%

n/a

View Results