Has your organization established an identity governance and administration (IGA) program or implemented an IGA platform solution? What do you consider to be key success factors when it comes to identity governance?
Sort by:
Agree to that specifically role based processes not position based processes. This goes quite neat with RBAC architecture than just having everything in PBAC (Policy Based) architecture that may lead to jungle of customized user group policies
In my experience, starting small is key to a successful IGA strategy. It's essential to identify critical risk areas, such as compliance-required applications and digital assets exposed to external threats. By categorizing and prioritizing these assets, you can manage the program more effectively and incrementally implement the right IGA solution.
We initiated a pilot program with seven applications but paused it to pursue a more advanced solution. Our current legacy system lacks support for open standards and doesn't offer adequate entitlement management or role management capabilities. We plan to restart the program with a new tool that better meets our needs.
We faced similar challenges with legacy systems complicating our IGA efforts. Interoperability is crucial, and we haven't yet achieved the desired results with our current identity governance tool. We're evaluating new tools to find a solution that aligns with our needs.
Our IGA journey began in 2012, and after four years, we chose Omada as our tool. Over the past eight years, we've learned that business processes drive IGA success, not technical aspects. Understanding how business processes operate, such as approval workflows and role definitions, is crucial. By aligning IGA with business inputs, we've successfully integrated major systems like Active Directory, Entra, ECC, and now S/4HANA.