PaaS users: Have you adapted to the transition from database administrators to Database-as-a-Service? Do you still experience gaps with your PaaS provider's DBaaS offering?
VP in Construction, 51 - 200 employees
Not yet, but we plan to.Chief Information Officer in Manufacturing, 10,001+ employees
We are looking into DBaaS to fill in the gap we have in supporting our DBAs. We can't get DBAs who want to work in the office. I know it's a company culture issue, but remote is not an option.CTO in Software, 51 - 200 employees
We are using 90% of the time DBaaS, are more reliable, updated and easy to maintain. In our experience the cost of maintenance for that DBs drop by 70% annually.We experienced with MongoDB Atlas, Google Cloud SQL, AWS RDS and Azure SQL.
For all of them IaC provisioning, automatic scalability up/down, upgrades, backups and migration are more easy than the self-managed DBs.
DB is becoming a commodity in my opinion.
Content you might like
It is always accurate and up to date.17%
Quarterly, using surveys, spreadsheet trackers and other cross-functional processes.54%
Annually, when we do a yearly review across the company.15%
We do not have a data map yet.15%
198 PARTICIPANTS
More than adequate10%
Adequate82%
Less than adequate7%
Completely inadequate0%
337 PARTICIPANTS
Vice President for Information Technology in Education, 1,001 - 5,000 employees
We're doing integrations ourselves. We looked at iPaaS for a long time, but we started doing a lot of this integration before there were good iPaaS solutions on the market that were affordable. The middleware is not that ...read more
No significant gaps with DBaaS at the moment. Backup used to be a limiting factor where you needed to relay on the vendor native tools and not many 3rd party vendors offered it but that has changed and most of the vendor offer backing up Azure SQL databases nowdays