Does cyber warfare require a new set of international laws, or are the laws in the Tallinn Manual sufficient?
New laws should be written for cyber warfare50%
Laws in the Tallinn Manual are sufficient26%
Unsure22%
Other (please share below)2%
191 PARTICIPANTS
Content you might like
Cyber insurance with ransomware coverage44%
Law enforcement contact(s)44%
Ransomware response plan60%
Ransomware task force/team39%
Bitcoin account for ransomware payments14%
Disaster recovery site33%
Other (comment below)1%
573 PARTICIPANTS
Fraud mitigation19%
Protection of reputation and brand56%
Protection of consumer data19%
Regulatory or compliance requirements6%
172 PARTICIPANTS
CTO in Software, 201 - 500 employees
Without a doubt - Technical Debt! It's a ball and chain that creates an ever increasing drag on any organization, stifles innovation, and prevents transformation.ISSO and Director of the IRU in Healthcare and Biotech, 10,001+ employees
I would definitely suggest this based of how you categorize your types of data/systems and information being stored in certain parts of your data center. I think it’s really dependent on the size of your organization and ...read more
Threat actors, if they change behavior at all, would simply alter what they do just enough to maintain plausible deniability in attribution.
Far more effective, and enforceable, would be holding companies and government agencies to standards for protecting data and reporting breaches. If hacking is already illegal, additional laws won’t deter them as much. If a huge corp has to spend some money on security, the biggest consequence for them is their earnings per share may be slightly lower.