How high a priority is implementing governance for low-code/no-code tools to increase IT and business productivity?
The top priority35%
A high priority51%
Not a priority13%
208 PARTICIPANTS
The top priority35%
A high priority51%
Not a priority13%
Yes, I believe it is the right amount 33%
Yes, it is the right amount about I will quit 48%
No, I believe it is expensive, but I will be staying26%
No, I believe it is exaggerated, and I will quit14%
I prefer to discuss in the comments
The case will settle; zero to minimal impact70%
Yes! But effects and repercussions are unknown30%
No selling.
No recruiting.
No self promotion.
Rules of EngagementFAQsPrivacy
© 2025 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
About 7 years ago, we embraced a no-code/low-code turn. We have created a Center of Excellence that centralize and deliver all solutions developed using a tool we have selected (ServiceNow).
This was a way to fight (and eradicate) Shadow IT solutions (or End-User Development) by providing less expensive solutions.
Getting rid of End-User Development was a priority since our regulator saw those solutions as potentially at risk.
Now, even with a form of governance, it sounds very tempting for even "regular project" to jump into the low-code/no-code as it was cheaper than developping a solution using a traditionnal framework.
We need to increase our alertness to carefully take the right decisions. Otherwise, we would have replace one problem by another one!