How high a priority is implementing governance for low-code/no-code tools to increase IT and business productivity?

The top priority34%

A high priority51%

Not a priority13%

208 PARTICIPANTS
2.1k viewscircle icon1 Comment
Sort by:
Strategic Banking IT advisor in Banking10 months ago

About 7 years ago, we embraced a no-code/low-code turn.   We have created a Center of Excellence that centralize and deliver all solutions developed using a tool we have selected (ServiceNow).

This was a way to fight (and eradicate) Shadow IT solutions (or End-User Development) by providing less expensive solutions.

Getting rid of End-User Development was a priority since our regulator saw those solutions as potentially at risk.

Now, even with a form of governance, it sounds very tempting for even "regular project" to jump into the low-code/no-code as it was cheaper than developping a solution using a traditionnal framework.

We need to increase our alertness to carefully take the right decisions.   Otherwise, we would have replace one problem  by another one!

Content you might like

Implementation complete24%

Implementation in progress46%

Planned within the next 12 months17%

Not planned10%

Not enabling O365 on mobile2%

View Results

Homegrown deployment tooling is manual and hard to maintain23%

Long deployment processes make it difficult to manage dependencies and risks43%

Deploying to multiple cloud vendors is complex / difficult60%

Compliance requirements (i.e. FedRAMP, SOC2) are hard to achieve with existing tooling49%

Lack of standardized tools and/or consistent processes across siloed teams19%

Technology sprawl has created too many starts/stops and manual steps in our SDLC13%

Migrating to a cloud service has been too slow / cumbersome4%

View Results