How likely is quiet quitting to increase insider risk?

Talent Management & Performance Risk Management

Very likely8%

Likely49%

Moderately likely26%

Moderately unlikely10%

Unlikely2%

Very unlikely1%

Unsure

448 PARTICIPANTS

2.8k views1 Comment

Sort by:

Senior Director, Defense Programs in Software3 years ago

Studies show employees have had low engagement for years without any intention of causing harm.

From a security responsibility, it is critical to educate employees about their responsibilities regarding company data and information security, as well as the consequences of any unauthorized access or disclosure of sensitive data.

While quiet quitting should be addressed with improved engagement providing value to employees, it does not necessarily pose a significant risk of insider threats. However, it is important to have proper procedures in place to mitigate the risk of insider threats, regardless of how employees engage.

Content you might like

What’s the hardest decision you made in the last 6 months that ended up being the right one for your team?

How often do you survey your organization for new, emerging risks? My company currently does quarterly surveys and I am contemplating dropping it down to 2x/year. Appreciate the insights!

How do you effectively manage patch management in your organization? It is a very daunting operational task but yet important to secure your organization.

Virtual patch 36%

Leverage on AI agent for some low and medium severity59%

Conventional way of patch management (lots of human intervention)16%

View Results

How can AI-enabled tools impact retention on security teams, whether for better or worse?

Do you think that job candidates are too focused on building GenAI skills and potentially neglecting other areas of expertise?

Yes86%

No14%