Is it alarmist to consider AI-induced human extinction a global priority, similar to pandemics and nuclear war?

Machine Learning (ML)Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Yes, it is alarmist18%

No, it is not alarmist48%

Not sure20%

AI-induced extinction should have a higher priority10%

AI-induced extinction should have a lower priority2%

AI-induced extinction is important, but not on the same level3%

124 PARTICIPANTS

916 views1 Upvote1 Comment

Sort by:

CIO3 years ago

I don't know the regulations that are put in place to battle these things but AI induced human extinction can't be written off, considering what AIs are doing these days

Content you might like

So far this year, $210 Million worth of ransomware payments have been tracked by analytics firm Chainalsyis. How much will have been spent in ransomware transactions by the end of the year?

$300 - $400 Million26%

$401 - $500 Million45%

$501-$600 Million11%

$600 Million +12%

Unsure5%

View Results

What team compositions and skill sets do you think are essential for AI-enabled IT organizations? What roles or functions are critical to have as you build AI capabilities?

Is your organization pursuing large-scale AI enablement, such as enterprise-wide access to tools like Microsoft Copilot, or are you focusing on high-value use cases within specific functions? Why have you chosen that approach?

How are you building enterprise AI capabilities? What factors are driving your build-versus-buy-versus-partner decisions?

How do you evaluate opportunities for automation?

We follow a defined hyperautomation process9%

We use decision-making techniques (like SWOT or Pareto analysis)45%

We ask employees for input28%

We follow industry automation trends8%

We base choices off of the automation tools we have available2%

We use another method (I'll comment below to share)3%

We don’t use automation1%