What are organizations currently using today or considering the use of in 2022-2023 in terms of email protection - Spam, Malware, URL Phishing, Scamming, Spear Phishing, Domain Impersonation, Brand Impersonation, Lateral Phishing, or Account Takeover. What are some of the reasons you selected a solution? Deployment, Cost, overall effectiveness/capabilities, support, research and development/investments in product or solution delivery related.
Proofpoint32%
Mimecast40%
Azure Threat/Advanced Threat Protection58%
Barracuda Email Protection - Advanced/Premium19%
Other - Comments6%
503 PARTICIPANTS
Content you might like
Exclusively via organization-managed desktops, laptops, and mobile devices (phones and tablets)40%
Via a hybrid of organization-managed AND employee owned desktops, laptops, and mobile devices (phones and tablets)50%
Exclusively via employee owned desktops, laptops, and mobile devices (phones and tablets)6%
Other4%
220 PARTICIPANTS
CTO in Software, 201 - 500 employees
Without a doubt - Technical Debt! It's a ball and chain that creates an ever increasing drag on any organization, stifles innovation, and prevents transformation.0-1 minutes5%
2-4 minutes31%
5-8 minutes23%
9-15 minutes10%
15-30 minutes5%
31+minutes2%
We haven't experienced a DDoS attack this year.21%
547 PARTICIPANTS
ISSO and Director of the IRU in Healthcare and Biotech, 10,001+ employees
I would definitely suggest this based of how you categorize your types of data/systems and information being stored in certain parts of your data center. I think it’s really dependent on the size of your organization and ...read more
Used Baracuda in the past, a solid cost-effective product.
Using ATP at the moment, ok product, the nicest thing it's there with o365 no external integration.
Proofpoint - probably best product but also most expensive.
Mimecast - Almost as good as Proofpoint, at least twice cheaper.