Question for those still using Cobol, do you trust GenAI-based coding assistants to translate Cobol correctly?
Yes, limited need for Cobol knowledge25%
Somewhat, but still need significant Cobol knowledge55%
No16%
Not sure yet4%
97 PARTICIPANTS
Yes, limited need for Cobol knowledge25%
Somewhat, but still need significant Cobol knowledge55%
No16%
Not sure yet4%
Yes — for all/most use cases 17%
Yes — but only for some use cases 35%
Not yet — we’re working on it 26%
No 22%
Unsure/other
SaaS discovery solution (like Netskope or Cisco Umbrella) 27%
CASB tool 46%
Packet sniffing (deep packet inspection) tool 30%
EDR tool/platform 19%
Something else (please share in a comment) 16%
N/A — we’re not currently using any tools to track shadow AI5%
No selling.
No recruiting.
No self promotion.
Rules of EngagementFAQsPrivacy
© 2025 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Over the last 2-3 years, we look to several solutions that would allow to REFACTOR Cobol applications to Java, for instance.
Then, we realized that our legacy system (built using Cobol, IMS FastPath Transactions, a bit of Assembler here and there) was quite complex.
Then, we looked at generating Cobol Code (since our challenge was to maintain sufficient number of developers) as it would relief the pressure to find more people.
But the code had to 'fit' in place with a very strict 'framework' we built. The result wasn't absolutely satisfying.
Our legacy system has around 15 millions lines of code and uses a lot of common modules.