Are short term bans of the use of GenAI applications and tools (such as ChatGPT) a good idea for end users in most organizations? For context see this article on the State of Maine Government's directive before you vote: https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/chatgpt-generative-ai-gets-6-month-ban-in-maine-government
Yes - Maine did the right thing. There are too many security risks with free versions of these tools. Not enough copyright or privacy protections of data.36%
No, but.... - You must have good security and privacy policies in place for ChatGPT (and other GenAI apps). My organization has policies and meaningful ways to enforce those policies and procedures for staff.45%
No - Bans simply don't work. Even without policies, this action hurts innovation and sends the wrong message to staff and the world about our organization.11%
I'm not sure. This action by Maine makes me think. Let me get back to you in a few weeks (or months).7%
Content you might like
Input from the hiring manager58%
Input from recruiter51%
Job template from internal database51%
Job template from online job descriptions35%
Input from industry professionals27%
Other (please share below)0%
SANS newsletters21%
CISA-supported newsletters44%
Center for Internet Security (CIS) Newsletter48%
Schneier on Security25%
Brian Krebs23%
CyberWire23%
AWS Security Digest33%
MITRE 360 Newsletter9%
ChatGPT or variation14%
Elon Musk3%
Other (please share in comments)3%
Let companies set internal versions with their data so that they don't need to publish their context to outside world.