Has anyone reviewed both the MIT success rate and the ChatGPT success rate?

12 views1 Comment

Sort by:

11 hours ago

I’ve reviewed both. The ChatGPT report provides metrics on usage, segmented by categories such as asking, doing, and expressing, with insights into effectiveness drivers. The MIT report analyzes corporate success rates in scaling AI from pilot to enterprise, identifying patterns for success. I combined both reports in Google’s notebook LLM to create a podcast.

Content you might like

Have you decided on a distinct operating model for AI? Is it different than IT or D&A? Is this centralized, distributed, federated?

Do you feel AI security tools positively or negatively impact your cyber staff’s perspective on job security?

Positively impacts cyber staff’s perspective on job security77%

Negatively impacts cyber staff’s perspective on job security15%

Unsure8%

View Results

Can you share an example of a small, localized AI pilot that was transformed into an enterprise-wide capability? What were the key steps and relationships required to make that happen?

What are key ways in which your organization should hire affordable AI and data science talent? Check all that apply.

Recruit talent from diverse or non-traditional backgrounds (e.g. different degrees, institutions, or work experience)34%

Recruit less experienced AI talent with a high aptitude to learn 44%

Communicate the intrinsic benefits of the role (e.g., mission, culture, resources, opportunity for impact) 31%

Build talent pipelines through partnerships with academia and professional societies41%

Hire and upskill internal talent50%

Use specialized AI recruitment agencies11%

Other (please share details in comments)1%