What’s your biggest frustration with your current cybersecurity tools? (don’t need to name names, just generally speaking)
Sort by:
Lack of integration in the broadest sense.
False-positive is the biggest frustration, especially if they are very common or continue to happen after you whitelist processes/activities reported as false positive.
On the general side, I'm not fond that almost all cybersecurity vendors have extensive use of the buzzwords like AI, ML, and DL. When you get into deep technical conversations with their engineers about how those technologies are used, how they differ from their competitors, etc., you don't get straight answers, which leads you to believe they are just buzzwords. Not all vendors are like that, but I see more and more that use fancy advertisements, which decrease your trust in those brands/vendors.
Too much noise and too few actual actionable positives. Also, far too many steps involved in getting the information that we need out of the numerous streams of incoming information.
There are almost too many of them, a lot of which do very similar things. Sifting through all of the sales rhetoric and being able to find the actual problem or risk that you're trying to address is the biggest frustration with the tools and the process of acquiring/implementing them.
Too many tools and most are underutilized.