What is the consensus on how many AV tools should be incorporated into the network?

173 viewscircle icon4 Comments
Sort by:
Director of Enablementa year ago

Good question, but to answer it we need to break it down further. 

Are you asking how many vendors, how many tools, or how many layers of protection that you need to deliver a proper AV solution?

If you’re in a position where you’re thinking of just implementing something like Defender for endpoints, then you’re doing something well. However you need to not just look at defending this edge, but instead take a look at defence in depth. Consider the overall strategy of your architecture to identify the gaps and potential breaches. 

For some orgs, one AV solution is fine. For others, they may need 3. 

If you can answer the questions above, then we’ll be able to expand further. Otherwise, send me a direct message and let’s talk :) 

1 Reply
no titlea year ago

I was thinking layers. Thanks for the info.

VP of Information Security in Miscellaneousa year ago

Can you add a little more context? Typically, you will find 3 advanced malware/AV solutions in most normal infrastructures. 
Endpoints
Network Edge (FW,IPS)
Email 

Lightbulb on1 circle icon1 Reply
no titlea year ago

Thank you. This was what I was asking.

Content you might like

Much more23%

More50%

Neither (same level of focus on compliance)24%

Less1%

Much less

View Results

Significant increase

Moderate increase57%

Minor increase21%

Neither – budget will likely be the same21%

Minor decrease

Moderate decrease

Significant decrease

Unsure for now

View Results