In this ever in increasing AI world nothing is potentially as it seems.  For example invoices or receipts for expenses can now easily be artificially created to look like the real thing. To me this is changing the risk profile of audits and evidence we could previously rely on to back up process compliance may no longer be authentic.   I'd be interested to know how audit teams are responding to this and are you changing audit processes to reflect that collected evidence may not always be as it seems?

3.2k viewscircle icon3 Comments
Sort by:
Chief Audit Executive in Banking3 months ago

I think you would really need to evaluate if the risk of the potential fraudulent source document is worth changing your processes. Expense reporting is an area that analytics use is helpful and we would utilize this before creating a new audit test. 

IT Manager in Banking4 months ago

Publish the latest list of all different service providers with complete details (both for approved and not approved ones) published and your models to learn from that. This can help them to identify fraud cases. Also ensure in more frequent sample audit checks to validate the quality of assessment done by your AI agents. 

Lightbulb on1
CFO in Finance (non-banking)4 months ago

Implementing our AI tool to review claims we have AI check the validity of the service, was it a real doctor, is it an existing address, it is an existing pharmacy, etc. This can be done a lot faster thru AI than manually and likely provides better protection against fraud.

Lightbulb on1

Content you might like

Cost of RPA products24%

Lack of developers who can code RPA applications43%

Amount of customization needed to automate business processes27%

Lack of RPA code maintenance resources4%

View Results

Waterfall13%

Prototype19%

Rapid Application Development6%

Agile Scrum45%

Agile Kanban8%

Dynamic System Development1%

Lean Software Development2%

Other .. please add it down2%

View Results