Are you feeling pressure from the board to add AI solutions to your existing tech stack? How is this impacting the overall relationship?

IT Strategy & RoadmapArtificial Intelligence (AI)
924 viewscircle icon3 Comments
Sort by:
Head of Transformation in Governmenta month ago

Reflecting on the conversation, I believe we need to return to a culture of innovation and discovery. Boards have become accustomed to hyper-professional management and expect predictability, but it’s time to embrace risk and rediscover innovative, high-impact applications.

VP of IT in Services (non-Government)a month ago

There’s no pressure from our board, just curiosity and interest in value creation. Quarterly updates on AI and cybersecurity have reassured them that we’re taking a measured approach, which has strengthened our relationship.

CIO in Energy and Utilitiesa month ago

I receive regular questions from the board about AI and cybersecurity. Many of our tools already include AI, and my relationship with board members is strong, they understand that results take time. The measured approach has not negatively impacted the relationship.

Content you might like

Can anyone share their experience with BMC Helix ITSM? How does it compare to other ITSM solutions in terms of functionality, cost or scalability?

As enterprise AI adoption accelerates, how is your organization adapting its governance and risk oversight to keep pace?

Established AI governance framework with defined policies and oversight37%

Currently developing governance models and risk controls63%

Relying on existing security/compliance frameworks (no AI-specific policy)27%

No formal AI governance approach in place4%

View Results

Where have you primarily focused your time as CISO during the Covid-19 Pandemic so far?

Strategic cyber projects25%

Non-cyber projects38%

Crisis Management18%

"Business as usual" Operational Tasks15%

Other (Comment below!)2%

View Results

Currently in our Enterprise Architecture tool and repository, we have a Business Capability Model (BCM) and a Technology Capability Model (TCM). Enabling Applications (e.g., SAP, Salesforce etc.) are mapped to the BCM, and enabling technologies (e.g., API gateway) are mapped to the TCM. However, some capabilities like Data Management are common to both models and we are trying to figure out best way to represent that.

How have you organized your capability model? Is it a single model containing business and technical capabilities or two separate models? If later, how are you organizing common capabilities like Data Management?

Read More Comments

We’re evaluating a new ERP. Our company, PROENERGY is a vertically integrated power partner (gas plant design/build, O&M, manufacturing including our PE6000 turbine, and 2.6 GW ERCOT operations).

Considering: SAP Public Cloud, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics, IFS, and Infor Construction Cloud.

Key needs: manufacturing, complex structure with built-in consolidation/reporting, long-range planning, procurement/inventory, and core accounting.

We use Microsoft Dynamics today for CRM/Field Service. Biggest concerns: implementation partners and support resources.

Would love your thoughts.

Read More Comments